Re: [netmod] moving forward with schema mount

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> writes:

> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 08:05:54PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
>> 
>> Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on Nov 6th.
>> 
>> Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments are address unless significant faults are found.  Post LC comments have been made, which needed consideration, notably the relationship with NMDA and rfc7895bis and an alternate representation of inline schema.  These have been considered respecting their impact on the last call consensus and it is the position of the chairs that it is best to advance the existing schema-mount document at this time.
>>
>
> If we take the formal road, then you may want to read again Robert
> Wilton's email posted on November 2nd (Thu, 2 Nov 2017 17:06:34 +0000)
> again. He does talk about YANG library alignment - so YANG library
> alignment is not just post LC comments. (I personally prefer to have
> technical discussion than formal discussions but if it is necessary to
> g there...)

As a matter of fact, I proposed pretty much the same thing already back in
March 2017:

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg18045.html

Lada

>
> /js
>
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

-- 
Ladislav Lhotka
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67