Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7227bis-00
Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Tue, 19 September 2017 09:46 UTC
Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AB5132EDA for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 02:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NfSkBQvXNX6u for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 02:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 631921270AB for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 02:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from birdie (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:f4a0:4ce4:6515:464f]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF7B1622A2 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 11:46:18 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1505814378; bh=ptixUmRIS13Zew+dS9TRLQuxN91j2wInPPEG4S25Fkw=; h=From:To:Date; b=N/+sWf+aGTH6h4StLRGhZDV3M3GevVFXtKaAdZLc9AZJzd6oUMOzS976q6cTcyF4l eXNKypUIfQnsLPUfLXL52VSRCzXUmBM+kplT+PvamuyR4oIP4Nc7h7Vd/gNnTg0pvc mrz4fpLHWz3qWx3RYulKFTTp+BZbypjA1l4PVs6I=
Message-ID: <1505814417.5445.14.camel@nic.cz>
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
To: netmod@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 11:46:57 +0200
In-Reply-To: <393d3f20-98e3-b4de-e2d7-d627de59ac1f@labn.net>
References: <393d3f20-98e3-b4de-e2d7-d627de59ac1f@labn.net>
Organization: CZ.NIC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/jfXrhnTfBZc6N7DkXyR89M9ga7U>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7227bis-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:46:23 -0000
Hi, I support the adoption but I propose two conceptual changes: 1. Introduce a new module name and namespace so that it is not necessary to carry along the deprecated baggage. If readability is the primary concern, this is IMO the way to go. Instead of "ietf-ip-2", I'd suggest something like "ietf- ip-nmda". 2. Avoid obsoleting RFC 7277. I believe the old modules may continue to be used in areas where NMDA is an overkill, such as open source home routers. NMDA implementors should be aware of the new modules but there is no need to eradicate the old data models. #2 applies also to other modules for which the NMDA version is underway. Lada PS. The subject is wrong, it shoud be -rfc7277bis- Lou Berger píše v Po 18. 09. 2017 v 10:33 -0400: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7227bis-00 a working group document. Please > send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". > If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If > yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see > addressed once the document is a WG document. > > The poll ends Oct 2. > > Thanks, > > Lou (and Kent) > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
- [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-net… Martin Bjorklund