IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] intended status of the tree diagram document

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Wed, 15 November 2017 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69060126DCA for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:18:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MYpBOWpUy2aA for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:18:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C90124B17 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:18:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (h-40-225.A165.priv.bahnhof.se [94.254.40.225]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9743C1AE0311; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 14:18:43 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 14:18:43 +0100
Message-Id: <20171115.141843.1847219398633474861.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20171115130803.k7bqhj625tsnmd4i@elstar.local>
References: <20171115.135818.591114714397486064.mbj@tail-f.com> <20171115130803.k7bqhj625tsnmd4i@elstar.local>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/kA8du-RnZbMkQVKY_iZyfvTh06U>
Subject: Re: [netmod] intended status of the tree diagram document
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 13:18:45 -0000

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 01:58:18PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Currently, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams has intended status
> > Standards Track.  I think I heard during the meeting today that it
> > ought to be Informational.  I think this makes sense.  It would then
> > imply that other standards track documents will have the tree diagram
> > document as an informative reference.
> > 
> > Should we make this change?
> >
> 
> Makes sense to me. I could ask what you will do with the RFC 2119
> language in the ID but hey I do not ask these questions anymore. ;-)

Hmm, there is no 2119 language in this draft, so it should be ok.


/martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email