IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Fri, 13 October 2017 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458C5134249 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xfgPKKHuTnpE for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 980EB13300C for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id x7so11088160pfa.1 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Q37MAinD7+Elb9pvXTMKHRDRhh1qvDU/0IiH0GjDlSA=; b=X7btwIVp+mAni0byWwr7qsScAYPI8L4I51AVerY1SayOC37Pbogm/8oOmEuIJPH9MT 5DufFD9roLs4E3UA2K+GrEF/alpvVnS0bFEm1k8tgwZpHpEY1yNcjRsCXfii26+ZM2IL 88o2fJGV3uYpfu4GH7ih75WvYKTF3XA9ip0lbPwbt6dq5DDeKtbueBzKw5I4QS+RRZrw UjfUqEgDhgQXM0/UWAGYtXceAt+93l/wvh6sTfr6HSxY+ylPF7Ao+uuNs8CAAHi1ycjj 0u2xmBtpOCAP3NFPzlQw0UnLeoE/RKhqOaYiWkDqiC8I7pd7eOMkYFb5pLaPu+N813/p gr3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Q37MAinD7+Elb9pvXTMKHRDRhh1qvDU/0IiH0GjDlSA=; b=L/EmEFLyxJn/pNufVI8QLYuo2mJf84pKWN0TSOEr1Ea9+MbpFDSr4NvZ4mVpDrcaqY hqjvCo4Um+OVO4xV8zppASWxykA98ZehZIOBVFCcWufphyVEPPUIf0PfheD8WWJXUCsu /0PMetxFvWwX8sZIBu1+K3f3mGXQ+Q5ro+YqwthIbI7qLoBQ98+Um+9jW6rqRMp9yotI 7qE5u0wHsi5Eqi0dcVFxroFWWlcaj4Gy1mUrrmH8KxPRq8PvUcp/ujmUosuAva4fWOZR fuROTfLLwYyE98uZeRbyJDRgVCpNhJ0zhwLlz13Lp6PdbIx3yhS/rCngqSTKBpNY8bjS JeRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUqqHtpAWVaBB4PLgRHFJ2bH5/Ysflr/7PN+3CY1lTr1HkPnc30 uXxrS/ocbBZL3cU/aZMXmkdRIMtz
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QByvhi9QZhokFiAtipD+FeJGoQSENAEhSBInstgnkMZH8M0pLFaTAliIIi9KyiIta+1n1ugzA==
X-Received: by 10.99.6.18 with SMTP id 18mr1976926pgg.389.1507920433992; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:30d:1320:e415:8a2e:ba96:546? ([2001:420:30d:1320:e415:8a2e:ba96:546]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v14sm3537251pgq.72.2017.10.13.11.47.13 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <88288A22-2EF7-4491-A93A-2181ADACF994@juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:47:21 -0700
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <9797746B-DB76-4C1D-9184-EEA8B019026F@gmail.com>
References: <88288A22-2EF7-4491-A93A-2181ADACF994@juniper.net>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/oVL-eBn4iMD1uj3iHesSPgk5VPI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 18:47:16 -0000

Support.

> On Oct 13, 2017, at 7:37 AM, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e. 
> that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted
> legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for the
> changes to be made in the individual document, we'd like to move
> ahead with the adoption now, with the understanding that these 
> changes will be made in the -01 version of the adopted draft.
> 
> This is start of a two-week poll on making draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03
> a working group document.  Please send email to the list indicating 
> "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state
> your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to
> provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG
> document.
> 
> The poll ends Oct 27.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kent (and Lou)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email