Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC of NDMA NETCONF/RESTCONF drafts

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Wed, 31 January 2018 09:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAC412D848; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 01:28:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FuGWG7aa0La1; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 01:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 861481241F8; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 01:28:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2080; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1517390924; x=1518600524; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8AHDLqDoB9iYQvLGVqQxj64Ut2NPTYc9ecKMACG8ppw=; b=jQvx0ryv0MKmi85sw9TjhYjDjKqADHVOpTMG8hOnFKSXquRWys2GVon6 fyKQEdwTD7+FWGQqJtwlaxB/W2P6E/RbjEdVGK8eTAwcS1ajDt9j1EM8+ KfNUybkBzJxdFcb+7pGGGT2OplXE3nmO3Xs4gMViSldMFN15+ruW3i+ue E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B0AQDYinFa/xbLJq1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYMVgRN1KINgixiPeokSjkmCAgoYC4RJTwKDIhQBAQEBAQEBAQJrKIUkAQEEAQEhDwEFNhsJAg4KAgImAgIhBjAGAQwGAgEBihkDFRCJL51xgieHOQ2DHQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGQWBD4NMg2yBaCmDBYJrRAEBAoE8ARIBH4MXgmUFo1s+i0mFGoUGgh2GIoNxJodWji6BJogUgTw2ImBwMxoIGxU9giqDewEJckE3iiiCPAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,439,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="1716828"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Jan 2018 09:28:40 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.78] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-78.cisco.com [10.63.23.78]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0V9SdC7021914; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 09:28:40 GMT
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, netconf <netconf@ietf.org>, NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <CF60B198-564B-499A-9B17-E992569074CB@gmail.com> <D3BBAA02-AA28-4E13-A8CF-9B7925DEE2FF@gmail.com> <8148FDBD-2B46-4D3B-9A50-2323F3005976@juniper.net> <20180130193301.63e4xt5thsprsym6@elstar.local>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <ea1b6172-89e3-f3f1-24c8-7ee49e708faa@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 09:28:39 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180130193301.63e4xt5thsprsym6@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/udNDGF6f7CzqrytWm_mVLlP0SlI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC of NDMA NETCONF/RESTCONF drafts
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 09:28:47 -0000

As co-author, I have read and support both drafts for advancement.

In fact, I think that it is important that we get these drafts (and 
YL-bis) completed and standardized quickly, since the YANG models that 
IETF is standardizing rely on the NMDA.

Thanks,
Rob


On 30/01/2018 19:33, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> Same here.
>
> /js
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 06:55:32PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
>> I have read and support both drafts for advancement.
>>
>> Kent // co-author
>>
>>
>> ===== original message =====
>>
>> Authors and WG,
>>
>> We have not received any explicit support for this LC on this email thread. If you believe these drafts are important and should proceed, please state your support by responding to this email thread.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>> On Jan 17, 2018, at 10:39 AM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The authors of draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf and draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf have posted updates to their drafts, and believe that the documents are ready for LC.
>>>
>>> This starts a 2 week LC on the two drafts that will end on January 31. Please send your comments on this thread. Comments like “I have reviewed the documents and believe they are ready for publication”, or “I have concerns about the document because …” are welcome and useful for the authors.
>>>
>>> Authors please indicate whether you are aware of any IPR for either of the drafts.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Mahesh & Kent
>>>
>> Mahesh & Kent
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Netconf mailing list
>> Netconf@ietf.org
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netconf&d=DwIGaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=chxZG5ZrBnHC_vO0f9kYhGnMwAUeF2ALqnpqjt2FOwI&s=cLxPvaw3wBK8KfUx0ZKNPyqPPhC17Yx-o9SJQ_q4AWE&e=
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Netconf mailing list
>> Netconf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf