Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 24 March 2016 11:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7BE12DAB2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 04:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BaFdI1PpTwtk for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 04:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 593AB12DAAF for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 04:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2083; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1458819986; x=1460029586; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0bqXOavzo9er4cRqJjSrm6dNiuPC6cZIdA8T8B+aJHc=; b=mMJfMnT1kxI3Y5F9vrw9GHTaBtOW244EiWLdG6wA4JrTslCbEpjYq5/q yOWpr7TOXbOQJRzw/RWmyBvvwTw4WUJWHJiQkR2oUWVOfWwUJ/zZBFgoC eOs3zIYqEWkp21UPe0ns/6PLYla7jPXmN6fC35Nan995gkgwJwOiZ+Lrj 4=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CpBACH0vNW/xbLJq1evUaEDYYNAoF5AQEBAQEBZSeEQgEBBCNVARALDgoJFgsCAgkDAgECAUUGAQwIAQGII7AZkGQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDwiKYoc8glYBBJdegx6BZokAgVCHZ4VUjwliggMZFIE2O4oEAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,385,1454976000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="636506543"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2016 11:46:24 +0000
Received: from [10.61.202.49] ([10.61.202.49]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2OBkNgT032586; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:46:23 GMT
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
References: <33092781.1458705432558.JavaMail.wam@elwamui-rubis.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <9530271B-7639-41EB-BFBA-E9772BB3F1F1@juniper.net>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <56F3D38F.2040701@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:46:23 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9530271B-7639-41EB-BFBA-E9772BB3F1F1@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mNtJHcdPxql4k2Fq7ob2GJQLaCFUbgMnt"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/vk3c5d0Bc_CqM473QK9dbfoqWUI>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:46:28 -0000


On 3/24/16 12:42 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
> All,
>
> I believe that this thread's issue is resolved if the following text is added to the Security Considerations section:
>
>
> "This document defines a JSON encoding for YANG-defined data. It does not defined any mechanisms for signing or encrypting said data.  Use of an external mechanism, such as PKCS #7 [RFC2315] or JOSE [RFC7515 and RFC7516], is needed for such cases."

WFM.  Thank you!

Eliot