[newtrk] Re: IESG comments on draft-ietf-newtrk-decruft-experiment-02.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Tue, 20 December 2005 12:53 UTC

Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eogzy-0005gs-KY for newtrk-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 07:53:46 -0500
Received: from mailapps.uoregon.edu (mailapps.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.45]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA22081 for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 07:52:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailapps.uoregon.edu (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX19mr/ZbPtpZUzlteXGAPCxG1y9HtXzt+Dc@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBKCmFLk013528; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:48:15 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jBKCmFrV013527; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:48:15 -0800
Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com (mtagate1.de.ibm.com [195.212.29.150]) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBKCmExT013521 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:48:14 -0800
Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate1.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBKClsec208512 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:47:57 GMT
Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.213]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id jBKCloIC187796 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:47:51 GMT
Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBKCloKV016474 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:47:50 GMT
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBKCloGB016463 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:47:50 GMT
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-252-10.de.ibm.com [9.145.252.10]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA70798 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:47:49 +0100
Message-ID: <43A7FD75.407@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:47:49 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: New Track <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>
Subject: [newtrk] Re: IESG comments on draft-ietf-newtrk-decruft-experiment-02.txt
References: <43A6C189.5030808@zurich.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <43A6C189.5030808@zurich.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1213/Mon Dec 19 06:48:34 2005 on mailapps
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

A slight update on this. Alex also wants to discuss the title and
abstract, since he didn't feel they were explicit enough, and he
has a few more RFCs he wants to check with the Routing directorate.
So a little more fixing than listed below may be needed, but it will
be along the same lines.

     Brian

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Three Area Directors wished to discuss this draft. Please
> see the tracker for the comments.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=13660&rfc_flag=0 
> 
> 
> Russ Housley found the title confusing.
> 
> Mark Townsley believes that RFC 1582 is in use.
> 
> Alex Zinin believes that RFC 1598 is also in use.
> 
> There are some more general comments, but those are the DISCUSSes.
> 
> Does the WG agree to following as a proposed resolution of these comments?
> 
>      Brian
> ---------------------------------
> Note to RFC Editor
> 
>  The RFC Editor is requested to mark all the RFCs listed in
>  Section 3 as Historic and remove them from the list of
>  Proposed Standards.
> 
>  Please change the document title:
> 
>  OLD
>     Getting rid of the cruft: an experiment to identify obsolete standards
>                                 document
> 
>  NEW
>     Getting rid of the cruft: Report from an experiment in identifying
>           and reclassifying obolete standards documents
> 
>  Please change the following sentence in Section 3:
> 
>  OLD
>    Similarly, RFCs 1381, 1382, 1471,
>    1472, and 1473 were removed based on the belief that they were
>    actively in use.
> 
>  NEW
>    Similarly, RFCs 1381, 1382, 1471,
>    1472, 1473, 1582 and 1598 were removed based on the belief that they 
> were
>    actively in use.
> 
>  Please DELETE the following lines from Section 3:
> 
>       RFC1582 (Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits)
>       RFC1598 (PPP in X.25)
> 
> 
> 

.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html