Re: [newtrk] Re: IESG comments on draft-ietf-newtrk-decruft-experiment-02.txt

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 21 December 2005 13:40 UTC

Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ep4D3-0001KA-St for newtrk-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:40:52 -0500
Received: from mailapps.uoregon.edu (mailapps.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.45]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA13289 for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:39:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailapps.uoregon.edu (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX1/d4iPf2aUlprQOa3EWsNEWDOj0T8W47ow@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBLDTuN3007464; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 05:29:56 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jBLDTuHj007463; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 05:29:56 -0800
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBLDTtrf007458 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 05:29:55 -0800
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA5F25971E; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:29:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30000-02; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:29:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from halvestr-w2k02.emea.cisco.com (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550BE25971D; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:29:01 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:29:09 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, New Track <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>
Subject: Re: [newtrk] Re: IESG comments on draft-ietf-newtrk-decruft-experiment-02.txt
Message-ID: <8635B5E6C3C54CD0077C4054@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
In-Reply-To: <43A7FD75.407@zurich.ibm.com>
References: <43A6C189.5030808@zurich.ibm.com> <43A7FD75.407@zurich.ibm.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.3 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========D011881A8BF2E5E602CB=========="
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1213/Mon Dec 19 06:48:34 2005 on mailapps
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk


--On 20. desember 2005 13:47 +0100 Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> 
wrote:

> A slight update on this. Alex also wants to discuss the title and
> abstract, since he didn't feel they were explicit enough, and he
> has a few more RFCs he wants to check with the Routing directorate.
> So a little more fixing than listed below may be needed, but it will
> be along the same lines.

I've suggested (with my co-author hat on) the following changes:

Title:

  Getting rid of the cruft: Report from an experiment in identifying
           and reclassifying obolete standards documents

Abstract:

   This memo documents an experiment to review and classify Proposed
   Standards as not reflecting documented practice within the world
   today.  The results identify a set of documents that were marked
   as Proposed Standards that are now reclassified as Historic.

If the group does not object to those changes, and the IESG finds them 
sufficient, we're good to go....