Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on meeting)

[spencer shepler <[e-mail]>]

Cutoff for additional meeting requests is June 2nd.  At this point, I am
not inclined so submit another meeting request.  We need time requests from
all contributors to get a better sense of agenda.

I would also suggest that the charter discussion should continue in email
and if needed, we can set up a conference call to discuss further before
the Prague meeting (to offset time used in agenda).

I would also ask that for new topics that people consider writing short
I-Ds or short write-ups that can be shared with the WG alias prior to the
meeting to make the time in meeting more effective.

Spencer

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Adamson, Andy <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> If there is interest and time (and my travel is approved), I could present
> a demo of RPCSEC_GSSv3 work in linux where I have Full Mode labeling and
> inter-ssc copy_from/to_auth coded and working now - I anticipate having the
> final copy_confirm_auth GSSv3 privilege working as well.
>
>
> -->Andy
> ------------------------------
> *From:* nfsv4 <[e-mail]> on behalf of David Noveck <
> [e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:40:10 AM
> *To:* Thomas Haynes
>
> *Cc:* [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on
> meeting)
>
> Tom is the first to actually post time requests, and now it seems clear
> that 150 minutes are going to be tight.
>
> Tom has quite reasonably asked for twenty minutes.
> No actual time estimates have been posted but it is hard to imagine a
> charter discussion taking less than 30 minutes
>
> Assuming Administrivia takes no time, this leaves 100 minutes to divide
> among:
>
> Christoph talking about NVMe and an RDMA-based layout.
>
> Chuck talking about next steps for RDMA.
> Some combination of Andy, me, and Chuck talking about migration, trunking
> and the interactions between them, for both NFSv4.0 and NFSv4.1.
>
> I think we need to consider having multiple sessions and get the requests
> made while time is still available.  In any case, we need to move from
> "this is what I'd like to hear/talk abut" to "this is my agenda item and
> this is the time I need to deal with it".  Also, there may be people who
> have felt that, with two months still to go, there is plenty of time left
> to make requests.  Now that reasonable assumption is no longer valid.  If
> you need to talk to the group at IETF99, let us know soon.
>
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Thomas Haynes <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>> Peeking head out of hole in the ground, ground I say!
>>
>> Flex files wrap up (to force me to finish) - 10 minutes
>>
>> Futures: 10 minutes
>> Do not return Open State if a Delegation is also issued
>> Soft Quiescing of Writes for Snapshotting
>>
>> On May 8, 2017, at 3:25 PM, Spencer Shepler <[e-mail]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the input.  I have requested a single, 2.5 hour session for
>> IETF99 in Prague the week of July 16th.
>>
>> Spencer
>>
>> *From:* nfsv4 [mailto:[e-mail] <[e-mail]>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Adamson, Andy
>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 27, 2017 7:08 AM
>> *To:* Christoph Hellwig <[e-mail]>; Chuck Lever <[e-mail]
>> >
>> *Cc:* [e-mail]
>> *Subject:* Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on
>> meeting)
>>
>>
>> I would also like to meet and clear up NFS4 and NFS4.1 mulitpath.
>>
>>
>>
>> -->Andy
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* nfsv4 <[e-mail]> on behalf of Christoph Hellwig <
>> [e-mail]>
>> *Sent:* Sunday, April 23, 2017 4:14:07 AM
>> *To:* Chuck Lever
>> *Cc:* Christoph Hellwig; [e-mail]
>> *Subject:* Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on
>> meeting)
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:28:28AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> > I have cycles to help with a draft, if you'd like to offload
>> > some of that work.
>>
>> Drafting should be easy - I'll need to get my prototype into a shape where
>> I even want to document it.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfsv4 mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnfsv4&data=02%7C01%7Csshepler%40microsoft.com%7C0faa9162b3f34934769508d48d770212%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636288989654278779&sdata=mYH16wA5K5N9snEYNpstsWgW7OBrDMkaKmhqNG%2FhrrU%3D&reserved=0>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfsv4 mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfsv4 mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>
>