Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on meeting)

["Adamson, Andy" <[e-mail]>]

If there is interest and time (and my travel is approved), I could present a demo of RPCSEC_GSSv3 work in linux where I have Full Mode labeling and inter-ssc copy_from/to_auth coded and working now - I anticipate having the final copy_confirm_auth GSSv3 privilege working as well.


-->Andy

________________________________
From: nfsv4 <[e-mail]> on behalf of David Noveck <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:40:10 AM
To: Thomas Haynes
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on meeting)

Tom is the first to actually post time requests, and now it seems clear that 150 minutes are going to be tight.

Tom has quite reasonably asked for twenty minutes.
No actual time estimates have been posted but it is hard to imagine a charter discussion taking less than 30 minutes

Assuming Administrivia takes no time, this leaves 100 minutes to divide among:
Christoph talking about NVMe and an RDMA-based layout.
Chuck talking about next steps for RDMA.
Some combination of Andy, me, and Chuck talking about migration, trunking and the interactions between them, for both NFSv4.0 and NFSv4.1.

I think we need to consider having multiple sessions and get the requests made while time is still available.  In any case, we need to move from "this is what I'd like to hear/talk abut" to "this is my agenda item and this is the time I need to deal with it".  Also, there may be people who have felt that, with two months still to go, there is plenty of time left to make requests.  Now that reasonable assumption is no longer valid.  If you need to talk to the group at IETF99, let us know soon.


On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Thomas Haynes <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Peeking head out of hole in the ground, ground I say!

Flex files wrap up (to force me to finish) - 10 minutes

Futures: 10 minutes
Do not return Open State if a Delegation is also issued
Soft Quiescing of Writes for Snapshotting

On May 8, 2017, at 3:25 PM, Spencer Shepler <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:


Thanks for the input.  I have requested a single, 2.5 hour session for IETF99 in Prague the week of July 16th.

Spencer

From: nfsv4 [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Adamson, Andy
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 7:08 AM
To: Christoph Hellwig <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; Chuck Lever <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on meeting)


I would also like to meet and clear up NFS4 and NFS4.1 mulitpath.



-->Andy

________________________________
From: nfsv4 <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> on behalf of Christoph Hellwig <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 4:14:07 AM
To: Chuck Lever
Cc: Christoph Hellwig; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on meeting)

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:28:28AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> I have cycles to help with a draft, if you'd like to offload
> some of that work.

Drafting should be easy - I'll need to get my prototype into a shape where
I even want to document it.

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnfsv4&data=02%7C01%7Csshepler%40microsoft.com%7C0faa9162b3f34934769508d48d770212%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636288989654278779&sdata=mYH16wA5K5N9snEYNpstsWgW7OBrDMkaKmhqNG%2FhrrU%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4


_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4