Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21

> > Chuck talking about next steps for RDMA.

> I don't think anyone wants to hear me droning about RDMA
> for 30 minutes. Let's cut this off at 20 minutes.

Although I did use the phrase "Chuck talking", I didn't mean that you would
be talking (or "droning" as you put it) the whole 30 minutes.  I did
anticipate that there would be questions and a discussion of the topic,
"Next steps for RDMA" in addition to your presentation.

> Focusing on using the existing time wisely seems like a better approach.

I accept that it might be too late to switch to a longer time.

> Otherwise we will try to fill up 300 minutes

I want to be clear that I wasn't suggesting that we try to fill up two
150-minute sessions.  I believe there are some shorter sessions, including
some one-hour ones.

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
wrote:

>
> > On May 10, 2017, at 11:40 AM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Tom is the first to actually post time requests, and now it seems clear
> that 150 minutes are going to be tight.
> >
> > Tom has quite reasonably asked for twenty minutes.
> > No actual time estimates have been posted but it is hard to imagine a
> charter discussion taking less than 30 minutes
> >
> > Assuming Administrivia takes no time, this leaves 100 minutes to divide
> among:
> > Christoph talking about NVMe and an RDMA-based layout.
> > Chuck talking about next steps for RDMA.
>
> I don't think anyone wants to hear me droning about RDMA
> for 30 minutes. Let's cut this off at 20 minutes.
>
>
> > Some combination of Andy, me, and Chuck talking about migration,
> trunking and the interactions between them, for both NFSv4.0 and NFSv4.1.
>
> I can forfeit my time here, though I will participate
> actively as an audience member. Migration issues in NFSv4.1
> and Andy's multi-pathing work are most interesting to me.
>
>
> > I think we need to consider having multiple sessions and get the
> requests made while time is still available.
>
> Focusing on using the existing time wisely seems like a
> better approach. Otherwise we will try to fill up 300
> minutes and a lot of that will be topics that can easily
> be dealt with on list, or for which there is limited
> interest.
>
>
> > In any case, we need to move from "this is what I'd like to hear/talk
> abut" to "this is my agenda item and this is the time I need to deal with
> it".
>
> That will leave us with a lot of proposed talks, and no
> gauge of what is actually interesting to people. In other
> words, IMO both types of responses are valuable.
>
>
> > Also, there may be people who have felt that, with two months still to
> go, there is plenty of time left to make requests.  Now that reasonable
> assumption is no longer valid.  If you need to talk to the group at IETF99,
> let us know soon.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Thomas Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com>
> wrote:
> > Peeking head out of hole in the ground, ground I say!
> >
> > Flex files wrap up (to force me to finish) - 10 minutes
> >
> > Futures: 10 minutes
> > Do not return Open State if a Delegation is also issued
> > Soft Quiescing of Writes for Snapshotting
> >
> >> On May 8, 2017, at 3:25 PM, Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for the input.  I have requested a single, 2.5 hour session for
> IETF99 in Prague the week of July 16th.
> >>
> >> Spencer
> >>
> >> From: nfsv4 [mailto:nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adamson, Andy
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 7:08 AM
> >> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>; Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com
> >
> >> Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on
> meeting)
> >>
> >> I would also like to meet and clear up NFS4 and NFS4.1 mulitpath.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -->Andy
> >>
> >> From: nfsv4 <nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Christoph Hellwig <
> hch@lst.de>
> >> Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 4:14:07 AM
> >> To: Chuck Lever
> >> Cc: Christoph Hellwig; nfsv4@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on
> meeting)
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:28:28AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >> > I have cycles to help with a draft, if you'd like to offload
> >> > some of that work.
> >>
> >> Drafting should be easy - I'll need to get my prototype into a shape
> where
> >> I even want to document it.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nfsv4 mailing list
> >> nfsv4@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nfsv4 mailing list
> >> nfsv4@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfsv4 mailing list
> > nfsv4@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfsv4 mailing list
> > nfsv4@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>

Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on meeting)