Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on meeting)

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Wed, 10 May 2017 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9914A129B84 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 08:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wZpey-qcv9G4 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 08:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20FE21294A1 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 08:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id g126so3848882ith.0 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 08:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AAD0sGppfBWjloDjtvnokp0ppWvYpnR1iJ5uDllzoPs=; b=C6caLk4y0zkMKqiVN4r+e56U/Knbxy0Z2nk9tsVzvDAU3Gq7eFmJ/UVP3Iy4ZvNja3 /VgC7RnvcAGIuc4clFu7LEGidfZXiU0N3NlOMSS/yQHH0bLA9sXUw9UPEMar9tBSYRLe tNyxQ/iUPKOULbHstOtajnDxRhnIQF3oj11w+EgnraghmlQ9yBIYLlKJ5mvHICmFu3u6 zvXvxH7cQ8CYthb+WSfu1NMqcQeKi+PLZXJFEdnwtupNIgjDKLd7el2g3G1WIKdUs+9J NNgE7B8f9jOdHX5Iem+bwNC2lEpNr71ftT3Zt7XHgoSm6+8lbPWMgdJLizLmUnPGs+r3 nHeg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AAD0sGppfBWjloDjtvnokp0ppWvYpnR1iJ5uDllzoPs=; b=jjqne3VMRZkNULt4MeA+Z9ujBwmGJLOBJ7Sb61oiQjjcZZRjP+8/H8ABYHaDsv5I3P suB56LRuIgtS4AoTj0dL3X/A7YQomq37nEyq4C8w75iEKZr8h6bRbD7wtCEv2unDrIdk S+hqBBc8Ho04zu/CWo4ZjNGgMd9clFiyZy+ceAYe6VWdnC2dOjeDt30E2VNkMa1Qwtwp Yk07SP5xiDz2Wu6oIqt5bNLt0kJDK62pV3UdQf66NDiO9tOfZppIxjHNw6yjmuWpYhzu 98bsN0/CkHMko+j1nMOQSehq4UqxsStimqBYW59xMfdV0L8M0QnbyTtbDDAQkcAA6XcI atiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcD6oDuh/K6YtUqwhFhKZx5i9Ylr1J1b9C3CiM2pPJa2DvF8gnvo RlriOWQVF6x06BW2QFvWdLDuUxPGjw==
X-Received: by 10.36.65.142 with SMTP id b14mr1988884itd.3.1494430811340; Wed, 10 May 2017 08:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.20.75 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2017 08:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BCBD9182-E2E1-4C7E-A942-1855505DEE95@primarydata.com>
References: <CAFt6Bak-5O+Pi15KbuwDJc8GYnR8Nh_zAz5iMhj4PLSja4YoAA@mail.gmail.com> <20170421142852.GA30579@lst.de> <52553727-6395-40C8-B07D-61C29693E5BB@oracle.com> <20170423081406.GD22942@lst.de> <BN3PR0601MB1347641E76848DEA0458CF5285100@BN3PR0601MB1347.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <MWHPR03MB2893FAF624A0CC7C8B3E90D5C7EE0@MWHPR03MB2893.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <BCBD9182-E2E1-4C7E-A942-1855505DEE95@primarydata.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 11:40:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jdWiDSpvntPtQB6LokoxvZi0kRkbVuR_bXHk4yOjA_1HA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com>
Cc: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c14c02a6d373054f2d4912"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/poo8I39J_jG9moJOnsjRyw2EJ1M>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on meeting)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 15:40:15 -0000

Tom is the first to actually post time requests, and now it seems clear
that 150 minutes are going to be tight.

Tom has quite reasonably asked for twenty minutes.
No actual time estimates have been posted but it is hard to imagine a
charter discussion taking less than 30 minutes

Assuming Administrivia takes no time, this leaves 100 minutes to divide
among:

Christoph talking about NVMe and an RDMA-based layout.

Chuck talking about next steps for RDMA.
Some combination of Andy, me, and Chuck talking about migration, trunking
and the interactions between them, for both NFSv4.0 and NFSv4.1.

I think we need to consider having multiple sessions and get the requests
made while time is still available.  In any case, we need to move from
"this is what I'd like to hear/talk abut" to "this is my agenda item and
this is the time I need to deal with it".  Also, there may be people who
have felt that, with two months still to go, there is plenty of time left
to make requests.  Now that reasonable assumption is no longer valid.  If
you need to talk to the group at IETF99, let us know soon.


On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Thomas Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com>
wrote:

> Peeking head out of hole in the ground, ground I say!
>
> Flex files wrap up (to force me to finish) - 10 minutes
>
> Futures: 10 minutes
> Do not return Open State if a Delegation is also issued
> Soft Quiescing of Writes for Snapshotting
>
> On May 8, 2017, at 3:25 PM, Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the input.  I have requested a single, 2.5 hour session for
> IETF99 in Prague the week of July 16th.
>
> Spencer
>
> *From:* nfsv4 [mailto:nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org <nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org>] *On
> Behalf Of *Adamson, Andy
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 27, 2017 7:08 AM
> *To:* Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>; Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> *Cc:* nfsv4@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on
> meeting)
>
>
> I would also like to meet and clear up NFS4 and NFS4.1 mulitpath.
>
>
>
> -->Andy
> ------------------------------
> *From:* nfsv4 <nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Christoph Hellwig <
> hch@lst.de>
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 23, 2017 4:14:07 AM
> *To:* Chuck Lever
> *Cc:* Christoph Hellwig; nfsv4@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [nfsv4] IETF 99 - July 16-21 - Prague (request for WG on
> meeting)
>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:28:28AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > I have cycles to help with a draft, if you'd like to offload
> > some of that work.
>
> Drafting should be easy - I'll need to get my prototype into a shape where
> I even want to document it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnfsv4&data=02%7C01%7Csshepler%40microsoft.com%7C0faa9162b3f34934769508d48d770212%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636288989654278779&sdata=mYH16wA5K5N9snEYNpstsWgW7OBrDMkaKmhqNG%2FhrrU%3D&reserved=0>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>
>