IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] IETF 98 - NFSv4 WG meeting (soliciting agenda items)

Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Wed, 01 February 2017 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <hch@lst.de>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102A312945D for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 07:05:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y6NyXmpUvvXh for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 07:05:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562151289C4 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 07:05:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id E563168D4D; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 16:05:47 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 16:05:47 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20170201150547.GA7561@lst.de>
References: <CAFt6Ba=BaG3+MyGGF-=JOaGOzwKTMaudL2Wxzh1d-2bQPBjZZA@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jdqqUtUmkJUtTaobfczmdyovH4oViB2Aj67cTVmTz3cew@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jdqqUtUmkJUtTaobfczmdyovH4oViB2Aj67cTVmTz3cew@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/Eys6BOQ-KhEAC37U2vzgk4MZ6UE>
Cc: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] IETF 98 - NFSv4 WG meeting (soliciting agenda items)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 15:05:52 -0000

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:44:07AM -0500, David Noveck wrote:
> I hope we can hear from Christoph regarding NVMe-related stuff,

I might do another minor update of the NVMe layout, I just need to find
some time.

> whether he
> is able to be physically present or not.

I won't make it to Chicago, but I plan to be in Prague in July.

> In addition, I'd like us to her
> about the progress of the scsi layout draft.  That took eight months to go
> from -00 to working group consensus :-) and over thirteen months after that
> and it is not out yet :-(. I think we have a general problem and need to
> understand it better before we try to fix it.  Hearing from Christoph would
> help us understand what is going on.

It's in the RFC Editor stage now, and I just had an interaction with
them yesterday.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email