Re: [nfsv4] IETF 98 - NFSv4 WG meeting (soliciting agenda items)

My thanks to everyone on input for agenda items.

Given the current list and discussion, I suggest that we skip the Chicago
IETF meeting.

As suggested, it does seem prudent to schedule a "design" conference call
to cover open items more efficiently than email and would garner effective
attendance.

If I don't hear any objections by Friday morning (Feb 10), I will register
our non-meeting intent for Chicago.

Spencer

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:18 PM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:

> If you want to hear (or participate in) a versioning discussion there are
> options that can simplify travel planing;
>
>    - If we do meet, you can participate remotely.  It may not be ideal
>    but it is better than not participating.
>    - If we don't meet, we can still arrange a conference call, if there
>    is enough interest.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:39 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
> wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth, I'll try to make it mainly for versioning
>> discussion, but I'd only give about a 50/50 chance.  It's a somewhat
>> complicated week for me due to a kid's birthday and some
>> still-in-planning travel both the weeks before and after, so I may not
>> be able to.
>>
>> --b.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>
>