Re: [nfsv4] IETF 98 - NFSv4 WG meeting (soliciting agenda items)

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Thu, 02 February 2017 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B4C129999 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:41:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZkOw24WNeU-o for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:41:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D0FB12999D for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:41:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id j15so15540341oih.2 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 11:41:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0Av+ypt66f8EpwIUKfwq8YCaN+uiuf1uckTjp6IAEcQ=; b=sayxUlwmEbBb8LLxeTlmMafMjMxHy5P1kJDIEeuP8oX4glBhcEe+KUtWf7fFYHLO9U 4lf10rQtJ9fzu3zHRswopz7lDTrpjKCYh+8luvAvGqgdeIiWL2gpYAv7vnNIbh5ia44X qarycJJC1Ef6rp7VZbkGVHZ21fZzO5Ctaojr5jubYKblyd0FwYTtBMNS72orxGvGkz/Y X2bYDEOLs6VhtvyeVvJaMux/lyVU0DnsuUhD3i8UEWdP1WMIZJly8bsAzNkcem9HHOuX +ENVBtQghZU2dMOKwgOw6Nz9xk64SC3PZLZdWM/j2PE0HmCC/7xIu6MRwz4YyGK4Xpq9 s13A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0Av+ypt66f8EpwIUKfwq8YCaN+uiuf1uckTjp6IAEcQ=; b=fviDccDSWce94Hfqjsn+4eJq3HrnjXK45rHXij8eNw4i1FbTTR5cYgzZLdPknewKeZ OcopdJVU9G06W5UR1rWVxehQz0i7QqqAh3G6lY9kPpCx3QjWnwzNR6SzfQBoVUujZVUV 8y3CHr2pcde30gDdQpeSthFDcwW0QCVbPDiUpBUFpi7sohs3jWzI/t9gK0ze/PaaY7gn 8pkUsGRAw8QwK15o0jARIodyt11tdPUdoq39KF8gVz/yFt9U2ZidZF/f6VFbwNroT8p6 x/qfLt1wuXUdisAtDXlRQ70jTn8iSvwUKeBu1sDiJXoyESLs5gZLlTf7y1T7/mZbYKDq A68g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKhQtLTmVWSEB+k8LtdZReQ8vqHEjhvo6YEspQWJAVKk8LciuoZUUSOcJ7yu3lXFwH3sv//Yd+CifkuXw==
X-Received: by 10.202.117.210 with SMTP id q201mr4512527oic.126.1486064495736; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 11:41:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.137.200 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:41:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <EAFC1D7B-7BAA-49EF-86B9-16E2B164EBC0@primarydata.com>
References: <CAFt6Ba=BaG3+MyGGF-=JOaGOzwKTMaudL2Wxzh1d-2bQPBjZZA@mail.gmail.com> <EAFC1D7B-7BAA-49EF-86B9-16E2B164EBC0@primarydata.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:41:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CADaq8jcGu+8TDSpZ59yL7hmFA+LVbesjL4GDYJ=ELdS0TOyXLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1135064a61be880547915a49"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/W0TYhJ9bj3doDdDLQh2as3nFHiU>
Cc: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] IETF 98 - NFSv4 WG meeting (soliciting agenda items)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 19:41:38 -0000

> Do not return Open State if a Delegation is also issued

I guess the idea here is that, if the delegation allows you to do the open
locally, the sever might as well let you do that

Sounds good to me.

> Soft Quiescing of Writes for Snapshotting

I approve of the direction, but there may be issues deciding on the
appropriate distance (exactly how soft this is to be).

i can see how this would be useful.

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Thomas Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com>
wrote:

>
> > On Jan 31, 2017, at 10:48 AM, spencer shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi.  IETF 98 is coming up (Chicago) and the cutoff date for meeting
> requests is Feb 10th.
> >
> > Please send in your agenda requests, etc. so that we can determine if we
> will be meeting in Chicago and duration of meeting.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Spencer S.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfsv4 mailing list
> > nfsv4@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>
>
> I’ve got some stuff in the works I’d like to make a presentation on, some
> minor extensions.
>
> I probably will not have drafts available - but I do want to get buy offs
> on the direction.
>
> Do not return Open State if a Delegation is also issued - 10 minutes
> Soft Quiescing of Writes for Snapshotting - 15 minutes
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>