IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] IETF 98 - NFSv4 WG meeting (soliciting agenda items)

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Fri, 07 April 2017 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C021E12953E for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b9PYHa8hd_eL for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x232.google.com (mail-io0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0316A129488 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x232.google.com with SMTP id t68so20980364iof.0 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 11:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+kZDgXh+xxJCcNLNRcOqJ8JUjXYjKcu890qAYXUYNqM=; b=Kk6u4eL5PFFcO4yuNrYspA5DS4frrVPpgxveWRFhwZTUQqXsoiuY6ldYOICQOVK+C2 /f+bqK9ouuWFi4+VWFLN5gcNu37OG9jTHA7HCpy+QLZiWi5yzNZToTK7BPfu2KO0AFF7 ZLs3Yal7sTtDn0K7SWwjtahrJEcvUhKriLd/OcToyJd2piF5UTyxoW8wsKe3g1zFrsFW TqnV5HhMCjEYvg86f+XVg366m2Du+3jQl0EX5O8QlSQAZ+dkrLzpK2/SW/C6up4wF4iO 1ngurZ20Ig5nsayxKgwcLF7ytPOCYtAkVDNJ51r8WeKpI7dLA5ZXFOIH/liBtJ9M9D9d trWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+kZDgXh+xxJCcNLNRcOqJ8JUjXYjKcu890qAYXUYNqM=; b=UdeXrSWWGmy7z7PcYHHjUafycSaauQpd9ztA46owbgdJ1rlokSKCsl41bEuExYH3o8 xHlMSFBpgXf+vhBS2Fm6kbfj4d6duRvsTictqr4ly1gtcOGe3oGZhYummmUanK0uLan+ 09ElE6r5fOjVL1KpA8M833FJUplXqBbsYh1O/tNxQR1WdbOBxTzhCEIM0Xsf4f/MULE7 uKzxj+FIi+dJ7nmV8xpvtuT153B298/8uLwXE06rIxjtgIUq7+penrFB7PyG4R1I5M3v 2Ja0tFWRcalRLNH3LsiVhZ/0z8NLmX7Sqmy0VemYgMyoeRFJLd313+ZjnzQZDfr6wBCm vCbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0ZydHj2D9B/9tBl/x4dP/N5CwLqo9PzQo0mIv4CJiDx4vkFgDhSm+whkhqP1+Yd8B8uLM3b5SNEwjKCQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.136.93 with SMTP id k90mr40852025iod.224.1491589294244; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 11:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.10.167 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFt6Ba=6JyZHGvUWQTOYtzUnYk8fUQr7R2aQOezuM+j81ejRGw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFt6Ba=BaG3+MyGGF-=JOaGOzwKTMaudL2Wxzh1d-2bQPBjZZA@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jdqqUtUmkJUtTaobfczmdyovH4oViB2Aj67cTVmTz3cew@mail.gmail.com> <20170201150547.GA7561@lst.de> <CADaq8jfZRKLTmuzwq3VyUfCBQk1-fJPNDwHChf3-uqrRqSaGcQ@mail.gmail.com> <MWHPR03MB28936969C47DE5706C68572FC74D0@MWHPR03MB2893.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CADaq8jdk7QJoRieHYi2k755qJU5KE-smMVVSWMM09=mYjo_Rmw@mail.gmail.com> <20170301224100.GA21288@lst.de> <CAFt6Bakn7a3vwhr59W-BGUh1FPOko1kWpU7d85Yxygd4rzpN6A@mail.gmail.com> <CAFt6Ba=6JyZHGvUWQTOYtzUnYk8fUQr7R2aQOezuM+j81ejRGw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 14:21:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jfcbtNe2aXqsbKLShSE85vj=7qrCFi5jOS+3+xLaJriig@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>, spencer shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ed51208e242054c97b249"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/lDE7tkcbgv0k2z5xSYKnZMhT3_0>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] IETF 98 - NFSv4 WG meeting (soliciting agenda items)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 18:21:37 -0000

> The RFC Editor has responded and the I-D will be moving to AUTH48 within
the next week.

It is now five weeks later and  we've heard nothing to suggest AUTH48 is
any closer.  I'm

assuming that Spencer S. meant to put quote marks around the RFC Editor's
prediction.

Is here any way to get a reliable ETA on this, or at least some sort of
explanation for this
extraordinary delay?  After all, RFC 5661, which was over 600 pages long,
got through this
process in one month.

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:31 AM, spencer shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> The RFC Editor has responded and the I-D will be moving to AUTH48 within
> the next week.
>
> Spencer
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:16 PM, spencer shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> I have responded on the RFC editor thread. Will also follow-up with
>> Spencer D.
>>
>> Spencer
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:16:53AM -0500, David Noveck wrote:
>>> > Thirteen  days later, the document is still in MISSREF and appears not
>>> to
>>> > have moved forward
>>> > at all.  Maybe something has happened that I'm unaware of but it may be
>>> > that you are still
>>> > waiting for a response from the RFC editor.  Has there been a response
>>> yet,
>>> > or at least some sort of an ETA provided?
>>>
>>> Another two weeks later I've still not seen any respone since clarifying
>>> the references.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nfsv4 mailing list
>>> nfsv4@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>>>
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email