IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: (ngtrans) Last call on draft-ietf-ngtrans-dns-ops-req-02.txt

itojun@iijlab.net Sat, 20 October 2001 07:23 UTC

Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA09687 for <ngtrans-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 03:23:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.144.170.5]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03344; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 00:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id AAA08152; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 00:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1) with ESMTP id f9K7LUOI001422 for <ngtrans-dist@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 00:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1/Submit) id f9K7LU0O001421 for ngtrans-dist; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 00:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: sunroof.eng.sun.com: majordomo set sender to owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com using -f
Received: from engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail4 [129.144.134.6]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1) with ESMTP id f9K7LQOI001412 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 00:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.5.43]) by engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v2.1p1) with ESMTP id AAA01852 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 00:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA24660 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 01:20:58 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE7D4B22; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 16:21:20 +0900 (JST)
To: Alain Durand <alain.durand@eng.sun.com>
Cc: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
In-reply-to: alain.durand's message of Fri, 19 Oct 2001 11:36:17 MST. <3BD072A1.A90DBC05@eng.sun.com>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Last call on draft-ietf-ngtrans-dns-ops-req-02.txt
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 16:21:20 +0900
Message-ID: <20834.1003562480@itojun.org>
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: itojun@iijlab.net

>>         the basic rule is simple.
>>         - if you would like to query everything available in the world,
>>           your resolver has to be dual-stacked, or you have to forward your
>>           queries to dual-stack resolver.
>>         - if you would like to show your zone to everyone in the world,
>>           your zone has to be served by dual-stack nameserver, your upstream
>>           zones (like "com" for foo.com) has to be served by dual-stack
>>           nameserver.
>Doing that basically split the global DNS  view in two.
>This seems to me in total contradiction to RFC2826:
>"IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root"

	i believe you are badly confused, or mixing things up.
	when did I suggest having alternate root?

itojun

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email