IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: (ngtrans) Last call on draft-ietf-ngtrans-dns-ops-req-02.txt

Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Sat, 20 October 2001 17:14 UTC

Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA17537 for <ngtrans-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 13:14:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.144.170.5]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA11409; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id KAA12464; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1) with ESMTP id f9KHCPOI002152 for <ngtrans-dist@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1/Submit) id f9KHCP2B002151 for ngtrans-dist; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: sunroof.eng.sun.com: majordomo set sender to owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com using -f
Received: from engmail2.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail2 [129.146.1.25]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1) with ESMTP id f9KHCNOI002144 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from venus.sun.com (venus.EBay.Sun.COM [129.150.69.5]) by engmail2.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v2.1p1) with ESMTP id KAA17536 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netcore.fi (netcore.fi [193.94.160.1]) by venus.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA09998 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9KHCHp09922; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 20:12:17 +0300
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 20:12:16 +0300
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
cc: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Subject: RE: (ngtrans) Last call on draft-ietf-ngtrans-dns-ops-req-02.txt
In-Reply-To: <2B81403386729140A3A899A8B39B046403AE93@server2000.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110202011130.9914-100000@netcore.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

yOn Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Michel Py wrote:
> >> sure, but IPv6-only no.  A site couldn't possibly be serious about
> IPv6
> >> (that is, lots of IPv6-only subdomains) if it's own zone is not
> >> IPv6-reachable.
> 
> I have to disagree with this. A good example would be my own domain:
> arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us. Maybe I want to create
> ipv6only.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us. If I have to wait for people that
> resolve .us, .ca.us and .sacramento.ca.us to dual-stack, it might be a
> while.

A valid scenario, true.  Getting IPv6 enabled on all those three might 
indeed take a while.

Dual-stacked DNS server save the day... :-)

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email