RE: (ngtrans) Last call on draft-ietf-ngtrans-dns-ops-req-02.txt

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sun, 21 October 2001 15:31 UTC

Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA14525 for <ngtrans-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:31:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from engmail1.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.146.1.13]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA17970; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 08:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by engmail1.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id IAA27929; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 08:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1) with ESMTP id f9LFTfOI004075 for <ngtrans-dist@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 08:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1/Submit) id f9LFTfvf004074 for ngtrans-dist; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 08:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: sunroof.eng.sun.com: majordomo set sender to owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com using -f
Received: from engmail1.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail1 [129.146.1.13]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1) with ESMTP id f9LFTcOI004067 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 08:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from saturn.sun.com (saturn.EBay.Sun.COM [129.150.69.2]) by engmail1.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v2.1p1) with ESMTP id IAA27821 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 08:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by saturn.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA26050 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 08:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from randy by rip.psg.com with local (Exim 3.33 #1) id 15vKXf-0005yc-00; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 08:29:35 -0700
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Subject: RE: (ngtrans) Last call on draft-ietf-ngtrans-dns-ops-req-02.txt
References: <E15uznu-000Q0p-00@rip.psg.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110211531390.19968-100000@netcore.fi>
Message-Id: <E15vKXf-0005yc-00@rip.psg.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 08:29:35 -0700
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>> the task of this wg is to develop strategies and techniques for
>> transitioning from a pure v4 internet to a mostly v6 internet over
>> a period of a long time, i.e. a decade or N.  in the solution
>> space, it is not reasonable for there to be one or more partitions
>> where internet hostsand running v4 can not locate and reach
>> internet hosts running v6 or vice versa.
> But the questions (that haven't been answered properly, or asked for that
> matter) are, "does this have to be done now?" and "do we know _yet_ that
> this approach is the best one in the long run?").

this is not an 'approach', i.e. solution, tool, ...  it is a requirement.

> Again, I'd say "no".  For the next very many years (unless something
> unexpected happends) we'd be able to manage just fine with dual-stack.

mandating a dual-stack on all v6-capable hosts might be an approach.  but
i suspect it will not be acceptable in some application/vendor domains.

randy