IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: (ngtrans) Last call on draft-ietf-ngtrans-dns-ops-req-02.txt

itojun@iijlab.net Sun, 21 October 2001 03:53 UTC

Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA23759 for <ngtrans-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 23:53:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.144.170.5]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA27605; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 20:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id UAA11524; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 20:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1) with ESMTP id f9L3qROI003149 for <ngtrans-dist@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 20:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1/Submit) id f9L3qRf2003148 for ngtrans-dist; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 20:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: sunroof.eng.sun.com: majordomo set sender to owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com using -f
Received: from engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail3 [129.144.170.5]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1) with ESMTP id f9L3qNOI003141 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 20:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.5.43]) by engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v2.1p1) with ESMTP id UAA11502 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 20:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA29081 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 21:52:00 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D754B22; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 12:52:17 +0900 (JST)
To: Alain Durand <alain.durand@sun.com>
Cc: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
In-reply-to: alain.durand's message of Sat, 20 Oct 2001 11:54:57 MST. <5.1.0.14.0.20011020114902.00aa6f18@jurassic.eng.sun.com>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Last call on draft-ietf-ngtrans-dns-ops-req-02.txt
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 12:52:17 +0900
Message-ID: <26066.1003636337@itojun.org>
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: itojun@iijlab.net

>>         i believe you are badly confused, or mixing things up.
>>         when did I suggest having alternate root?
>You're suggesting it is OK to have different views of the DNS tree,
>depending on which protocol you are using to query the data.
>For me this is a logical equivalent of an alternative DNS root.

	no, I did not suggest so.  you are saying that a new magical tool is
	necessary.  I am saying that we can operationally workaround your
	problem, and I mentioned a couple of ways/rules to make it work.

itojun

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email