IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: (ngtrans) Last call on draft-ietf-ngtrans-dns-ops-req-02.txt

Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us> Sat, 20 October 2001 17:12 UTC

Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA17513 for <ngtrans-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 13:12:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.144.170.5]) by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03909; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 11:10:54 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id KAA12331; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1) with ESMTP id f9KHAYOI002135 for <ngtrans-dist@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1/Submit) id f9KHAYMM002134 for ngtrans-dist; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: sunroof.eng.sun.com: majordomo set sender to owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com using -f
Received: from engmail2.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail2 [129.146.1.25]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.1+Sun/8.12.1) with ESMTP id f9KHAVOI002127 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.5.43]) by engmail2.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v2.1p1) with ESMTP id KAA17454 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server2000.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us (adsl-209-233-126-65.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [209.233.126.65]) by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03767 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 11:10:08 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: RE: (ngtrans) Last call on draft-ietf-ngtrans-dns-ops-req-02.txt
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 10:09:15 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <2B81403386729140A3A899A8B39B046403AE93@server2000.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Thread-Topic: (ngtrans) Last call on draft-ietf-ngtrans-dns-ops-req-02.txt
Thread-Index: AcFY3dEnC5ltXX4dSzK6o14kLWWJwQAqSsDQ
From: Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by sunroof.eng.sun.com id f9KHAWOI002128
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Pekka,

>> If domain.com has only IPv4-only nameservers, that gives IMO a very
strong
>> implication that there are no IPv6-only subdomains.  IPv4/IPv6
dualstacks
>> sure, but IPv6-only no.  A site couldn't possibly be serious about
IPv6
>> (that is, lots of IPv6-only subdomains) if it's own zone is not
>> IPv6-reachable.

I have to disagree with this. A good example would be my own domain:
arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us. Maybe I want to create
ipv6only.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us. If I have to wait for people that
resolve .us, .ca.us and .sacramento.ca.us to dual-stack, it might be a
while.

Michel.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email