IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 02 September 2020 04:21 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3FB3A0B3D; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 21:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qDXTT2-LLnTV; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 21:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe36.google.com (mail-vs1-xe36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 878E83A0B3C; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 21:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe36.google.com with SMTP id e14so1864991vsa.9; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 21:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=O7FhWtkY+4KYcOMqIKuefyS0spjDcqI/0rab7pPfxVg=; b=WAv2HCW0w1td0a0utu61IBnWd/NdJ2nIWFSZB3jXlwAk+/X5oglfwRQfprxSJWjRRx Bx4+36YTH3XqoizmLuL0K6/OwlWDJkTNnkH021Q9iPDymb/5qrm2nIAFv5aGHTiI5Ahn vgS+acH4Y691efZYzxGS561fvRIY4F7hRxs2LuEIAFGYwf4t0Tc76AKD9tcqPEat5qkG 8cMdOvUqLd1lZQILzgNGjujcevJIcoTbPo0pqfekYBoF81oTOTzVuYhz+hGxCdv3u58P xrAvSxTl7DMZfOHm/sluqHWMFS261OVKS5/Qrs1WDVMuU0J6LLVMO91CH6903Rd/uME0 E2aA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O7FhWtkY+4KYcOMqIKuefyS0spjDcqI/0rab7pPfxVg=; b=lSK2DXUSIm54KtulW4TL4Xnj/o6G8SO37ZOP+XUDbSfvEUtZYJ0GTCytFJoJ3duoYu oewtcmIXyXsR9ldZ4Lej67nj5rGL9Dvk/MtF0HvngrtQ/vVUOrXLA4PKg54Er6/CTRTF o4GwppKbb7eh35/zGUTOYO+pXazxZ7JOigULY9UM0uxpfJ29fgnhkRhECDGoIqJI+xie HINSmDSzpEM2kyT5zIw/Z6tXScMm+fgOZNMWab+8fISx8dLABCqEIyc2kI63h91/b6yT QLCfb/APrXTBslcEYlWgey3TrUI5UM0XFPsLQkrZe6rFuKXlb8BabpavSTfDjGuvplyY Goxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530tnguHifQ273mPC4Hd7sgYsrzTJ3+NKLKxPopRhtpgyEt7octJ t7mniKPM4kdf8+b1FEQVSjeSuyNYd7NPy2rRsHTumWo00Gw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFHapz2iOKxb0JFbIelE1FkvKfgsXJq8oCw7on9DE4LodB3dgwKEANP4Y53CxpAX4cigEM0Ki396p4HeoQZ84=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:7d0d:: with SMTP id y13mr4229490vsc.212.1599020463408; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 21:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <odonoghue@isoc.org> <51912CB6-1A33-49DB-8DEA-0411F2B36C93@isoc.org> <20200828180157.6494140605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
In-Reply-To: <20200828180157.6494140605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 21:20:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYMB8gPu-Ldh6Mp0Uz-1svA2EsR1=dwddSx4WK0f7mo3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Cc: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "ntp-chairs@ietf.org" <ntp-chairs@ietf.org>, NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b5cab105ae4cf6bb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/6V2OPJWQ8vm8A6RVu9g1w0Z3rr4>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 04:21:06 -0000

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:02 AM Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote:

> I think what happened is that most of the reviewing was done while we were
> thinking Historic and we didn't go back and review things again with a
> fresh
> outlook after changing from Historic to Informational.  (I'm as guilty as
> anybody for not noticing that sooner.)
>
> Who is going to read the final document?  What is the goal?  I think the
> important next step is to get the abstract and introduction to line up
> with
> Informational.
> [...]
>

My impression from the telechat where the IESG discussed this is (and my
IESG friends are free to correct me if I'm mis-remembering) is that we
could be talked into either status, so long as the text in the document was
less ambiguous and is also consistently aligned with whatever the WG
chooses.

Some text was proposed up-thread (by Brian, I believe) that seemed like a
step in the right direction to me.  Eric also thought it was an improvement.

I'll send some detailed comments in another message.
>

Did you send those?  After a cursory look I didn't see anything on this
particular topic.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email