IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> Thu, 27 August 2020 02:15 UTC

Return-Path: <odonoghue@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E948D3A0C74; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isoc.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQIPCIsyziNv; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12on2041.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.243.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6C7C3A0DB9; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=HE21ZhHb9SYBLdC/zQFKAGscgopnlkOJprXlRPY21wgAZ16V8BgXUxeqhdvM6Zf/+9YcXwWnp2Sobni0UcXkX5o5/PhkFPiQAKPsFzqOLybCphQmrr6R7RYXXCMcouLisVfAyHfklenAefdwoIChq1iwrt5zSrtwAKoZwi3Y8xTb+H9VX/9PTCt9l3bWaj3fazfMiSm8YBiUJ45OQZfrAy2TX/1rpPJz0rye2ao0z3Mwkn15/zJsDH4jGoc9JfkFAhHwGH4hgdSXY9yAzotcATJXVr7vjqwIDDHmCUvD+r/iVHCHlbGQMaLYxPsrbhXxS4tXVxCepcvyBV0nVmKFcA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7P6YElG+naWQ/RAbRTAWXAtHl18eQSCbfHlLyBiLaG8=; b=fBIum6ivWLpLaHzaijpEmzl8zYBJwyIlhl6Ir3IT27wh3Krslwo2JDwqB4QhyGHVcEm+QbcYYIbgsu5MRsbgRScWSMPf9h/cVDc1yI7DZaC2KUCOefxo2eEu3kTMiNldHJJ9At8/FQQ9yTjlj9qp9JEN9rlwi/NUVbIpLqEhnJic0osSVxKWSTPtYPCWswdUNkU43O77OsWL8MHlmNcWFm6PeTcr5O/t9CID8u1ydSu86sldWG30vlTGrNOxUjfofY/imcAgTfWL25pQGYnJP/6su3rCBqfgIaI9gQrmFZmz+gBqIdzaXmfKCdxxcn0JR6+X2rIXNAnViXS1XT9g4Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=isoc.org; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=isoc.org; dkim=pass header.d=isoc.org; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isoc.org; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7P6YElG+naWQ/RAbRTAWXAtHl18eQSCbfHlLyBiLaG8=; b=1NCmyVvc3iz+QoBg9HUOauvxihKHuqCRgFvt28LuE+mhDf8IMgpaN13QfxHlPjcd+VAd5WIDQdBcUgNyVwj8yQUn/nYxQpct21dRywyNcsoCsJYJGjpO3P6LfGXq4uXMuWBHByK4+6E9n7z7+mmT4BfWp28fgYItfKg84+M78+o=
Received: from DM5PR06MB3018.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:3b::23) by DM6PR06MB6105.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:121::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3305.25; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 02:15:27 +0000
Received: from DM5PR06MB3018.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f537:8bda:580f:b1e9]) by DM5PR06MB3018.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f537:8bda:580f:b1e9%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3305.031; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 02:15:27 +0000
From: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds@ietf.org>, "ntp-chairs@ietf.org" <ntp-chairs@ietf.org>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWe+Hor+TMHhdXC0m0Vga4Cz9op6lK9QmA
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 02:15:27 +0000
Message-ID: <007F0CEE-BB5B-4215-BC8B-81C1EA9E2537@isoc.org>
References: <159847132272.24732.13477095672838990073@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159847132272.24732.13477095672838990073@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.40.20081000
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=isoc.org;
x-originating-ip: [24.233.206.51]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5b9c4064-6154-4580-d853-08d84a2f10a1
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR06MB6105:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR06MB61053A4C64087E08CD5DA953C2550@DM6PR06MB6105.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: RrlXl1ksKjRrjR2Onp+mqe1rWi0x8wni8mvrCh7rztljNCk8bbwURPLWx6JEuEG5H+Q7scHMdyYyhmtR8efcut56RLzKJyJUHNxQBe7H0eBsCn0/Vry5VuS2tJpq+2qU/IAJu9XAVa86nw6n8UifTHjrZ7lqPV53rBfiPGu8i/JMwhm72Z0Kj982xsNM7J4P2wNvXBV8EJ+GqkDccKYBIIZWqImsU9XOl0LrvO63BreXcpa+QDJTI+EjXF4eaajuDvvOY9wUapzJfTUvfj4Emn7HYHnsi5+813seCoYwmy0tHlPblbb+BB9pxfLyfCX4aRVdl0H3BRoJahJgT8WYQcsOQ2J8kdU/532+Wz3fzf0/J2fOC7L8s32gMTskrwqeKkE7dAzNWDIRx9WpBsfn+A==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM5PR06MB3018.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(136003)(39840400004)(376002)(346002)(366004)(396003)(2906002)(26005)(71200400001)(6506007)(186003)(4326008)(2616005)(8676002)(6486002)(86362001)(33656002)(110136005)(316002)(8936002)(83380400001)(966005)(36756003)(54906003)(66476007)(66446008)(76116006)(66946007)(478600001)(66556008)(6512007)(64756008)(91956017)(5660300002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B318198E2BFEB14DB2E823454E3DEE73@namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM5PR06MB3018.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5b9c4064-6154-4580-d853-08d84a2f10a1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Aug 2020 02:15:27.4756 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 89f84dfb-7285-4810-bc4d-8b9b5794554f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: A/GvknKvax2uBxNGukjnjkQMetAOiBMTVbxDp+zJHmPyC9ZJ60HPHLPwG19900tM5ZqIfJ5KtrSGDBStbDbWuA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR06MB6105
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/sHhCxmgbM9L3ADfkRlbjI63R_Yc>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 02:15:47 -0000

As stated elsewhere, the document was changed from Historic to Informational based on the IETF Last Call discussion. As shepherd, I forgot to update the writeup. It has been a contentious issue and at each major review point, we get suggestions to change it. My reading of the latest consensus was that most folks could live with either Historic or Informational. There were outliers. 

Karen

On 8/26/20, 3:48 PM, "Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

    Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: Discuss

    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)


    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds/



    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    DISCUSS:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    I find myself in agreement with Eric Vyncke's remarks about a document claiming
    to provide "current but historic" protocol details.  Is this because NTPv3 is
    still in use?  But the title talks about NTPv4.  Shouldn't this document have
    "Historic" status?  The shepherd writeup says that's the intent, but that's not
    what the document's title page says.

    Let's sort this out.


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    I found the same typos Roman did.  A quick pass with a spell checker might
    speed things through the RFC Editor slightly.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email