[Ntp] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I find myself in agreement with Eric Vyncke's remarks about a document claiming
to provide "current but historic" protocol details.  Is this because NTPv3 is
still in use?  But the title talks about NTPv4.  Shouldn't this document have
"Historic" status?  The shepherd writeup says that's the intent, but that's not
what the document's title page says.

Let's sort this out.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I found the same typos Roman did.  A quick pass with a spell checker might
speed things through the RFC Editor slightly.