Re: [Ntp] NTS IANA request

Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Thu, 06 June 2019 09:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mlichvar@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F27120115 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 02:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1TW06FyhoJfw for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 02:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEF0112009E for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 02:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ED213162918; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 09:58:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (holly.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com [10.43.134.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464A667C8E; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 09:58:40 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 11:58:39 +0200
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: Heiko Gerstung <heiko.gerstung@meinberg.de>
Cc: Watson Ladd <watson=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190606095839.GJ12384@localhost>
References: <CAN2QdAH9Uh_wYSEizgYTjd4Q6VFQT+tvH8dnbPgKKc59+vEfng@mail.gmail.com> <D396960F-1FD3-46CB-BE82-1EF2DC7C2613@meinberg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D396960F-1FD3-46CB-BE82-1EF2DC7C2613@meinberg.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.41]); Thu, 06 Jun 2019 09:58:57 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/Lbg5Gh1sZxpfG37PRy3XxhDsco4>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] NTS IANA request
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 09:59:01 -0000

On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 10:30:15AM +0200, Heiko Gerstung wrote:
> Since this is a system port and we will, as already discussed, have a hard time to convince IANA, why not use 36540. This is the number of seconds since midnight at 10:09 ;-) ... And as far as I can tell, it is unassigned too.

Or 14995, which is 'NTS' in "5-bit" ASCII characters.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar