IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Antwort: Re: NTS4UPTP Rev 03 - Formal request for WG adoption (SUPPORT)

Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> Mon, 31 May 2021 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F893A1F60 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 May 2021 10:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hB872B4yVSxZ for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 May 2021 10:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D44C3A1F5C for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 May 2021 10:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id k5so6930276pjj.1 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 May 2021 10:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GBsCfmTsdFSOWVobtxjGQ2QM51Kl5jgSOzJ03XOIb80=; b=fj38TxjzGCCQh3iV48rQor5bcB+bng0t2gz0cBQoSn9k6a0IAI0np52XgdbufLFwCB 61AGJeNFjBBOV6NbZ+dOYNaV1aN/fsF5pGNlLKJKMlJbkWAsCVxgp3sGW+wMnRlIV/pu FaNs3Krpaqu6uWlqYwfVOIFGcQm2w/rrXcMG7/eMnjaAK4n1sJQDCtsESJ9KPyYCNBCX zMpTl/+q9oIRUxc3PPB5zIrj+VQ0rNlzSLxUm/P+RY2bQALb0roCkIAx4uxc6olXWhTS mknfQDdrUVzX1sxh35CHD31Ma8ZQgkvSdQXwORRNqFgPle0wtUWR1eODiyS3ew99omRn v7QA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GBsCfmTsdFSOWVobtxjGQ2QM51Kl5jgSOzJ03XOIb80=; b=qeXGNVbbKzDoAadvJJ/Q8eDcaxwb/gIOu+Zti8kRFh/ww6TYvNH0D/M262b4jq/PHU rdZ8XcAI04Pqd5ZsvS3a+JkzrZDhlzsLQL1Yka7Ji9w/qxlZ+bOdM7EERgzl1DI7lfeg hPRQFf2cQp1b6dAhltI/vPtFuVsdduW6/HdakVtqN31YtKjVG6imZrqr/x32Sk4wLMuF ws7PCeSYbhUqzjB6EKfg01qRb67QHDuGLpdIrpF9njgblVEZWjY15LhjEbfBVI1c8y6c F49o6esaAgcBnHB8TtDG/Q5oKQw2p1vlKcILo0PuqFDOIS39+QaFikB5hvOei8SB6awk WxhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FMeqbZiuOf5z4ChmfmjZNMuAV861qDTc6TDVgraEmRNR9gpIC cgN+Nv1P2fHtUyN+TQWJczeMNaLn+kJQKB6KK1c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtO7TZbLfY2f7PuPku1ZJ1vaYdDKni/2ZENIMapQavhCn0ko3yngdRYo13Egns93v78Ow5a+XkBJdWqYe6rNw=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d88a:b029:103:f92:d88e with SMTP id b10-20020a170902d88ab02901030f92d88emr9715308plz.41.1622481696660; Mon, 31 May 2021 10:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5F0AB4A8-30FB-4EE4-904C-BCC2CDFCA552@meinberg.de> <CAJm83bA=uQb05KMtUJN_qk0J65eaa1Av5OBatrN4mAk3dPC11Q@mail.gmail.com> <D1556106-7B75-48B2-962C-BEDF035DDA26@meinberg.de> <CAJm83bDhGyd-au6+h0U0jaLVLSkiKY_pKDQCcLiSY09dPP5qAQ@mail.gmail.com> <024470C1-E225-4FF8-AFD0-FD6A6CEF48CB@meinberg.de> <CAJm83bDOc+84AV__CnpMHoRHTDftKAgMhS52jhTPkG-g-ZUzag@mail.gmail.com> <A15ACFA0-B9E1-4F60-B76B-7C2A9146F5D7@meinberg.de> <890a8653-4a6b-839c-6647-ae004df63c1f@ostfalia.de> <OF325169B1.59F4FB27-ONC12586E6.00530A04-C12586E6.0054F7F4@ptb.de>
In-Reply-To: <OF325169B1.59F4FB27-ONC12586E6.00530A04-C12586E6.0054F7F4@ptb.de>
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 13:21:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJm83bBuZ3K3sTmop-qjpXnBUnGpOnBSR9FvQ4kghgGOd0Wn6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: kristof.teichel@ptb.de
Cc: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/MTFb3sXOnglcgFOZGlk18I7FJxY>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Antwort: Re: NTS4UPTP Rev 03 - Formal request for WG adoption (SUPPORT)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 17:21:43 -0000

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 11:28 AM <kristof.teichel@ptb.de> wrote:
> @daniel: you talk about a proposal of yours that is in competition with Heiko's draft, I believe.
> Now  this might be a dumb question, but where can I find that?

My proposal is what's described here; I believe you were on the
thread: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/-gQcQH915bf7NFTCjJ8LfVe8aa4/

There's no associated I-D right now. I'd be happy to turn it into one
(with Informational intended status) if the WG thinks that would be
useful. If I do, I'd like to have a coauthor (someone who's worked
with IEEE1588 more closely than I have) to write the section on how to
process PTP packets once a plausible interval has been computed.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email