Re: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-04

Comments inline

Sent from my iPhone

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Schliesser [mailto:bensons@queuefull.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 5:46 AM
> To: John E Drake
> Cc: Eric Gray; Bocci, Matthew (Matthew); nvo3@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-
> problem-statement-04
> 
> If adopted, the draft will be renamed draft-ietf-nvo3-...

JD:  And prior to its adoption, its name would be?

> 
> At this time we are just talking about adoption of a Problem Statement.
> We will focus on Requirements separately, per our milestones.

JD:  The distinction between a problem statement and a set of requirements seems, in retrospect, to be artificial.

> 
> FYI, other text related to the Problem Statement can be contributed
> (and incorporated) after adoption, if that text has WG consensus.
> 
> Cheers,
> -Benson
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 8:33, John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> > Support.  However, it would be a graceful gesture for the document to
> be renamed to something other than 'draft-narten'.  Also, there are
> other requirements drafts.  What is their disposition?
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nvo3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:nvo3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> >> Of Eric Gray
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 4:57 AM
> >> To: Bocci, Matthew (Matthew); nvo3@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-
> >> problem-statement-04
> >>
> >> Support.
> >>
> >> Note: Several of the authors/co-authors of this draft are on
> vacation
> >> at least this week and possibly next.  I think it's fair to assume
> >> that they also support making this draft a WG draft, given that the
> >> request to do so came jointly from the draft authors/co-authors...
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nvo3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:nvo3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> >> Of Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:48 AM
> >> To: nvo3@ietf.org
> >> Subject: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-
> >> problem-statement-04
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >> At the Vancouver IETF, there was considerable support for adopting
> >> draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-03 as an NVO3 working
> >> group document. However, there was also some support for
> >> draft-fang-vpn4dc- problem-statement-01.
> >>
> >> Therefore, the chairs asked authors from both drafts, with help from
> >> Eric Gray, to work together on a common problem statement draft, the
> >> result of which is the subject of this adoption poll.
> >>
> >> If you support adoption of
> >> draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-
> >> 04,
> >> please reply to this thread with 'support'.
> >>
> >> If you do not support adoption, please reply to this thread with 'do
> >> not support', and state your reasons.
> >>
> >> This poll will close on Tuesday 28th August 2012.
> >>
> >> Note that we will be polling for adoption of the NVO3 framework
> draft
> >> separately. We will start that poll in a separate thread, shortly.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Matthew & Benson
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nvo3 mailing list
> >> nvo3@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nvo3 mailing list
> >> nvo3@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> > _______________________________________________
> > nvo3 mailing list
> > nvo3@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3