Re: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-04

<thomas.morin@orange.com> Mon, 27 August 2012 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.morin@orange.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9064621F8446 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 06:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.366
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.366 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.232, BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aiP2wkhoglXQ for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 06:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8565521F8444 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 06:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.2]) by omfedm10.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 79D8D26433D for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:12:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.183]) by omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 3F67827C057 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:12:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::cc7e:e40b:42ef:164e]) by PEXCVZYH02.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:12:36 +0200
From: thomas.morin@orange.com
To: "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-04
Thread-Index: AQHNhFWgYnCBc/ptkEuw1pFxuP0BWA==
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:12:35 +0000
Message-ID: <6065_1346073171_503B7245_6065_970_1_503B727C.3040309@orange.com>
References: <CC5031C9.322D5%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <CC5031C9.322D5%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
x-originating-ip: [10.197.38.2]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <42C1EC54B766A645B3622041F5B21B3F@adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.6.19.115414
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-04
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:12:59 -0000

Hi all,

*Support*, pending removal of this paritcular piece (end of the second 
paragraph of "3.5 Overlay Networking Work Areas"):
 >
> For example, routing protocols  (e.g., IS-IS, BGP) may have scaling
 > difficulties if implemented directly in all NVEs, based on both
 > flooding and convergence time concerns. An alternative approach
 > would be to use a standard query protocol between NVEs and the set of
 > network nodes that maintain address mappings used across the data
 > center for the entire overlay system.

The above, beyond the fact that it is very debatable, would belong to a 
discussion on solutions.

Thanks,

-Thomas



Matthew Bocci, 2012-08-14 :
> All,
 >
 > At the Vancouver IETF, there was considerable support for adopting
 > draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-03 as an NVO3 working
 > group document. However, there was also some support for
 > draft-fang-vpn4dc-problem-statement-01.
 >
 > Therefore, the chairs asked authors from both drafts, with help from
 > Eric Gray, to work together on a common problem statement draft, the
 > result of which is the subject of this adoption poll.
 >
 > If you support adoption of
 > draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-04, please reply to this
 > thread with 'support'.
 >
 > If you do not support adoption, please reply to this thread with 'do
 > not support', and state your reasons.
 >
 > This poll will close on Tuesday 28th August 2012.
 >
 > Note that we will be polling for adoption of the NVO3 framework
 > draft separately. We will start that poll in a separate thread,
 > shortly.
 >
 > Regards
 >
 > Matthew & Benson
 >
 >
 >
 > _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list
 > nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.