IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Open Issues: Group Survey (respond by 5/13)

Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 13 May 2010 23:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12DF3A6ABC for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 16:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.993
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.993 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.253, BAYES_20=-0.74, GB_I_LETTER=-2]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5d1ywUSfJryB for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 16:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f200.google.com (mail-qy0-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026703A67D6 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2010 16:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so477348qyk.17 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2010 16:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4+gx8GnCyKN20HXyuRlD4oOgBrhQea4O377Va+sLlqE=; b=NU5kuLOx0KSZUYf/9aXs6bGDJQh58pZ3Iz4V+1p4sw+CDbhKpLeeFDrED3746FKq3T vsESUkFM27ZP3RQAiyAOA6yXTZTFNirduL9rX/TIcvGs9EW/ji2ZafP5dRAx4tRUsAZW x7ZB6ZUIqTYK0atAmYzfew8CGsG02STFrLv08=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=S/QkJ+liGlz2pwm28qyMsjWawTs4EQkdqrR7BiICJLo2I7PTU2imAEffBT0kE+nO5d I0WW9eTj3hQgeMhKs4R8gfJTVoIvbu4DzDjMwgW6Uv62x+Y7MLSulJXDCyxoimuF0fog BDjOwy+6LgrLUHD0maw81JZR0vlR1jxMXFW2U=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.88.40 with SMTP id y40mr69036qal.383.1273794857585; Thu, 13 May 2010 16:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.99.142 with HTTP; Thu, 13 May 2010 16:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3B6989D0@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <ADB082E11CEB5D49A3CC03E49DCECE02378CB8A679@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3B698808@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <7C01E631FF4B654FA1E783F1C0265F8C4A42BFCC@TK5EX14MBXC117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3B69895B@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <AANLkTimiSqQjOsxDMxFGjIkP3xDQVHge6OJUPu9CYxHf@mail.gmail.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3B6989D0@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 19:54:17 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTik3_xSmDVp0vEQDtHiXFGxnhR6xOgLDGEPCSFdm@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Open Issues: Group Survey (respond by 5/13)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 23:54:30 -0000

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote:
> Can you give a reason why you are objecting to C.
>

As I just wrote:
> My objection to C was that your examples were buggy.

I don't think servers or clients will get XML, JSON, and form-encoded
right without taking on a lot of 3rd party dependencies.

Even if those dependencies are ok, three serialization formats will
enlarge the QA matrix enough to hurt interoperability. The nature of
this objection seems pretty obvious.

- Rob

-- 

Robert Sayre

"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email