IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Open Issues: Group Survey (respond by 5/13)

Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Thu, 13 May 2010 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46D43A6858 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 16:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.210, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EC90oR97dCdB for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 16:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.18]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D52A43A67D6 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2010 16:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9741 invoked from network); 13 May 2010 23:43:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.19) by p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 13 May 2010 23:43:07 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.19]) by P3PW5EX1HT001.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.19]) with mapi; Thu, 13 May 2010 16:43:07 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 16:43:22 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] Open Issues: Group Survey (respond by 5/13)
Thread-Index: Acry871AxrWfi4yNRSSTIQ+xy3o/RgAAkUlQ
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3B6989D0@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <ADB082E11CEB5D49A3CC03E49DCECE02378CB8A679@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3B698808@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <7C01E631FF4B654FA1E783F1C0265F8C4A42BFCC@TK5EX14MBXC117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3B69895B@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <AANLkTimiSqQjOsxDMxFGjIkP3xDQVHge6OJUPu9CYxHf@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimiSqQjOsxDMxFGjIkP3xDQVHge6OJUPu9CYxHf@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Open Issues: Group Survey (respond by 5/13)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 23:43:18 -0000

Can you give a reason why you are objecting to C.

EHL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sayre [mailto:sayrer@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 4:27 PM
> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
> Cc: Yaron Goland; OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Open Issues: Group Survey (respond by 5/13)
> 
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav
> <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote:
> > There is clearly no consensus for either A or B. There was mostly no
> > objection to C, and the reason given by most of those who objected was
> client complexity with the current proposal solves.
> 
> My objection to C was that your examples were buggy. So, to be tediously
> explicit:
> 
> B, then A. Not C.
> 
> - Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email