Re: [OAUTH-WG] Working Group Last Call on Dynamic Client Registration Documents

Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Sat, 05 April 2014 06:39 UTC

Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3539D1A0331 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 23:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vgHM1s9dD5sH for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 23:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.38]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F601A0330 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 23:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [91.2.89.182] (helo=[192.168.71.82]) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1WWKG4-0001MP-Q5; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 08:39:16 +0200
References: <533E77C3.9000509@gmx.net> <1396629672.75505.YahooMailNeo@web142804.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <1396629672.75505.YahooMailNeo@web142804.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-48C86FB4-BFE9-4475-AB30-CF223D8CC7A4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <495B4720-34D6-4588-9E63-A8F501D39177@lodderstedt.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11D167)
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 08:39:15 +0200
To: Bill Mills <wmills_92105@yahoo.com>
X-Df-Sender: dG9yc3RlbkBsb2RkZXJzdGVkdC5uZXQ=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/C_g6ffsnN_MD6FuIKt8KuDTp8WI
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Working Group Last Call on Dynamic Client Registration Documents
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 06:39:27 -0000

Hi Bill,

which scalability problem are you referring to? As far as I remember there were issues around the management API but not the core protocol.

regards,
Torsten.

> Am 04.04.2014 um 18:41 schrieb Bill Mills <wmills_92105@yahoo.com>om>:
> 
> Given the fundamental scalability problem we discussed in London do we really feel we're ready?
> On Friday, April 4, 2014 3:07 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This is a Last Call for comments on the dynamic client registration
> documents:
> 
> * OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Core Protocol
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-16
> 
> * OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Metadata
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-metadata-00
> 
> Since we have to do the last call for these two documents together we
> are setting the call for **3 weeks**.
> 
> Please have your comments in no later than April 25th.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes & Derek
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth