IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] auth-param syntax, was: OK to post OAuth Bearer draft 15?

William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com> Wed, 04 January 2012 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE2211E80D8 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 15:44:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.134
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.134 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.464, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EQzSlzHfbmWo for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 15:44:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nm18-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm18-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 237E711E809C for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 15:44:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [98.138.90.51] by nm18.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2012 23:44:41 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.197] by tm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2012 23:44:41 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1055.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2012 23:44:41 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 601877.50041.bm@omp1055.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 91527 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Jan 2012 23:44:41 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=ginc1024; t=1325720681; bh=UImjXNXsMg+65GLFQC9wTB1uOJ7DRbIzm5jtPoazNws=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EROMus+lhRTq9YR7HnrC4JwPMWxUq9LWDatCRrqHa45HbPMd03OFhJfcko2Itsy3Ztcse8Bh+HWKR6IGD2+QrQpHdtwVTXZ+u9nBRH7fvpIvFl20wuxgtXT4MdZhVhZNB6CkLFd8ss9AeOPheE8IlVRTVtBx4rQN8VSPAleXxM4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ginc1024; d=yahoo-inc.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=V7UytCSBG574q6sqPYzbRvAntNZHqe1bculEbg7MQZ0Bs39xJ/8o0ZEd753O/925lHhL3O/BQFAbpwNdC7x+xSrr/cINl4vvrw3D3+S9oOW/6aRp54KcDbV2KDHUFoh4enTuLszUb7YIXPtUnTdI1d3PpXFqbWQw9CX3bo3ZJVs=;
X-YMail-OSG: jolLFeUVM1lb7oQmnHDAxZHp_q84dCJ0cK80sXpKv2BNF1Z clHTf8xf.fPGoa.oDaasAmr6AG.EfCrVNWs5V5a0GsZq6kmYZnyBdPknDhda 5f9TM2zE5aSkkAYVTT0eWWdPeITWGCCxdOf17y8G1KDLYgmkPueN.mE6wZiV hkPUta8xIFsGuP1u_BVkueTSLXXOwXNz.je45kKlZMpyI9yw3YVWXbswaRnb WCJ5ozMQrUZIMtXbbauCgEin1fYWbOguYTsX9faQBbUBXjf0SQ5SfIEtmK5l 0iRVbN8eXh62PSQntzX3b7ei_ns3LyPusWGHgOD33RB6wXXdIxYu44CURkYz J6rmOdYzvc3AYYeSLBNSOMJbtUIFR_lFMrHzjDawGYgxHFKIEoRfnBkeB7.x DIEZR1rD75E0zDylFYhJJJs.dMTBMF.zma5Y-
Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web31806.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:44:41 PST
X-RocketYMMF: william_john_mills
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.116.331537
References: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435F763122@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <F6FCE30E-20FE-4FCD-AC31-AB227A42F2D2@mnot.net> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435F772D1D@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <4EEF13F1.7030409@gmx.de> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435F78F5BB@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <4EFD91B4.5050904@gmx.de> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435F790386@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <1325619340.463.YahooMailNeo@web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435F7936E7@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <1325620772.48511.YahooMailNeo@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435F79376F@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <1325621624.9908.YahooMailNeo@web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435F793829@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <1325623068.88228.YahooMailNeo@web31816.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5E5EA7F9-B4A0-4DCB-801C-3C0F4EC36A1E@ve7jtb.! com> <4F04CC2D.1080805@gmx.de> <7570AAA5-3C7B-409B-99AE-BC9C91F729FB@ve7jtb.com>
Message-ID: <1325720681.35382.YahooMailNeo@web31806.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:44:41 -0800
From: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <7570AAA5-3C7B-409B-99AE-BC9C91F729FB@ve7jtb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1055047407-1354576934-1325720681=:35382"
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] auth-param syntax, was: OK to post OAuth Bearer draft 15?
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:44:43 -0000

Does Bearer really have to go there?  Can it simply be pulled form Bearer?



________________________________
 From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 
Cc: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>; Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>; Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>; OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] auth-param syntax, was:  OK to post OAuth Bearer draft 15?
 
Don't get me wrong, I agree that it should be in core.

I just don't want to hold up core for something that only bearer seems to care about.

If there is consensus that it should be fixed in core then lets do that rather than leaving it up to bearer,  MAC and token types not yet imagined to do it independently.

John B.
On 2012-01-04, at 7:01 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 2012-01-04 22:40, John Bradley wrote:
>> You are correct. the Core spec should include this. However for one
>> reason or another it is not in the core spec and probably will not be,
>> given that it is in last call.
>> ...
> 
> The datatracker says:
> 
> "AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed" (<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-v2/>)
> 
> As far as I recall, this includes other changes needed by the bearer spec.
> 
> Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email