IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Version Notification for draft-hunt-oauth-v2-user-a4c-05.txt

Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com> Thu, 24 July 2014 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <sakimura@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D131A002A for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ny403AUBLeMA for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0834B1ABB34 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 10so2580965lbg.6 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CAO6g6eUU926M5gffLFDqh3GlPU0zgRg6r1ViXQe+FI=; b=u34LqRXlnxGh/VZ2OO/XHifrLdabK3AsrYdj5p+u1Ls+ZHBO0k2i5PMhcQbyxV59Ww DckbTgCuPDjAgZ+fljK8pHMP4CHMLmgF630tusKtnp/RugmFIoo7LDzrCgSOxLsgBtFe Nbp/DDuOclDHOjt/7bayhFLfQoCBWtvOXmD6t3NqExTIbEIz01WqW/UR1CJmvLXnCo+Z ZvyumtK/+tMFi80dGMbMa4omKS11a2o9tZHdRUDRgHTgCG4tAdSyQDzeYpyBMbGd//2P 9VarQ53eWKxG5nszG4CCIStzFG3FfbueAWxZXig16DdhNGUG4mLFvdj/ZF7khvrexQNu 06oQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.54.197 with SMTP id l5mr5912825lbp.103.1406227927275; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.150.233 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1406225861.40476.YahooMailNeo@web142802.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
References: <201407221830.s6MIUYrf031075@outgoing.mit.edu> <CABzCy2CxNQ2d3=m9Bvc0+k6ikqZkwb940HwskvnAGvKoGnteSw@mail.gmail.com> <DE16B8D3-3590-45B3-BE08-D1A7CF9EF0FB@oracle.com> <CABzCy2B_iB1ZBskFJObKJjnftEH1STVyhx1-AE6Chrj76-se8g@mail.gmail.com> <F7F8C65F-C805-4C29-86F0-1835B7A80E3F@oracle.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439ADDD8F2@TK5EX14MBXC294.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CAEayHEM4SAM_2DwF8ceC4sen++o7azZnP16xDR8EodqSkxFajA@mail.gmail.com> <04E6EF5C-F36C-4987-9BA6-AF92408EEFCE@mitre.org> <CAEayHENPDasnJ8JBgxRuZSkcWg3+=1g6gOJzodWAJtHqMmc_Ww@mail.gmail.com> <CABzCy2CWN81to7nAtxsnCjSiXFhzh+iOu-2zyg+cjfCSgQZqbQ@mail.gmail.com> <2cc10b23a4238ec0c76087b09d1d290a@lodderstedt.net> <6859A770-F6D2-4481-BD5F-2E73779BC745@ve7jtb.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439ADDE116@TK5EX14MBXC294.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CABzCy2Ar_pJt30ctP6hQ47rpSUGMh-+rrYssWe+XFNY73dA_YQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEayHENLvazYAcu==_3CM9x91DDqhHngtSarm4_qBu5Zf_-ipw@mail.gmail.com> <B3031E2C-8F1E-4DEC-B739-2F2FFC349D39@lodderstedt.net> <B86C4C6C-AC24-45DF-A3B4-F8D1A88BC64A@ve7jtb.com> <d4b20f338a298530b4a3430386502d25@lodderstedt.net> <1E5B5066-E619-4965-B941-62C2CD72A37E@ve7jtb.com> <CABzCy2Dmms4MGTsuQkzu3uQGChLtNDKQREo1_S7UwfaW3hQnqA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+k3eCSiwB3pC5j+zFgrLHg7DdnWMjdJ7VVfY=NWbeY-3ndoyA@mail.gmail.com> <9dbf8c7384e341a08334a9ee093697f8@BLUPR03MB309.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CA+k3eCTFpOyM78r7NAY=LVbYgdYC5dXUP4ej9i1ZUT6m_rO8PQ@mail.gmail.com> <45D858DE-6F5E-46D4-828C-9C4C80C3AC2A@oracle.com> <CABzCy2Da1P1GJ8jfUvQZ3dGFGgUwCMGbetX0CQvnsa3jFxAFbA@mail.gmail.com> <1406225861.40476.YahooMailNeo@web142802.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:52:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CABzCy2Cj3z=P=fM5a6drwSwqONeMdsjk42X2grEiFVRdpjmwWQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>
To: Bill Mills <wmills_92105@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3e85214201f04fef4f46d"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/HJUdIXhhdE861wFsk1_QJZJH7HI
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org list" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Version Notification for draft-hunt-oauth-v2-user-a4c-05.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 18:52:13 -0000

2014-07-24 14:17 GMT-04:00 Bill Mills <wmills_92105@yahoo.com>:
> Then why aren't people using this instead of (mis)using OAuth for this?

Even with a spec this short, IMHO, developers would not read it.
What they want is easy to read description with sample code, I suppose.
It also does not have adequate amount of publicity/marketing/education,
etc.
Example code repository in Github and Bitbucket etc. may help a bit.

>
> Different question, if we do define AC4 will people move to that, or
continue doing the wrong thing anyway?

They would not move to it because they will not read a spec.
Instead they will google or search stackoverflow for "OAuth Authentication
sample REST" or something like that and will use whatever comes up as easy
and appealing to read.

-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email