IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 21 June 2012 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C3C21F8679 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.937
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.937 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0pucoACVyNGC for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com (mail-qa0-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BEE21F8659 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qabj34 with SMTP id j34so1905265qab.4 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Snx0dotaiiCuFNhplZiLql9unIaLlEdrSWJew8d31Lk=; b=cjx3pIrAk0uXQbZiJNHbYPFPfKSqumgQejpLeV6PVAriBJBoSjn4LQxpp2dKt65uRl fnhtoIY7YJFi1jDZjsJ2QUKEuf6IaupAWOV0MzEHajOLtykYZgs1HMsToZhYVYPRQTiv p4qqPLxZKW4hCppEBAySmyAdN3f9qlPuwQmHC6wOn5PbAatNfpvTj4sr+VgIpzPJfBlv Cnm5xj7WwFDL0nrZcDv72UpfMSXH9/h4lB7F7oobmNw/f83fdTHkwqCEglGYFNcVutF9 hiW0U1mvG7baWPi3/vAv+LjcLl1HUW8sjtPxRYZ3kX3/RlZ8GuRHH96q8aB91pgx0cAm 0VaQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.40.2 with SMTP id i2mr1963755qae.62.1340313012530; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.245.85 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943665637A0@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <20120621175317.32545.76545.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC4RtVAcnGwv7yp=zwwAM--w-DubHfFpHFrKyHRzfe8Fjfg0Rg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+k3eCS0DYEqk4SDNpWJKJvWZgTqHAkojQVTPuZKmySHPxBR1A@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943665637A0@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:10:12 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: NA5qXw4IFR8it7JSgLX2dBPsbx4
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+sceJvFY_bhovjZrrXx7_C2P_WYcW4T1Jyh7f3Z2FTtg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 21:10:14 -0000

>>> Have Section 3 note that certain classes might create new
>>> sub-registries for what goes under them, if necessary.
>>
>> I honestly don't understand the push to have additional registries under
>> urn:ietf:params:oauth?
>
> I agree that one registry is sufficient.  The number of registrations won't be
> huge and so having sub-registries seems like overkill.

No, there was no "push"; I was just making a suggestion for how things
might be set up.  If there's no need envisoned for sub-registries,
that's fine.

b

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email