Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split
Brian Eaton <beaton@google.com> Wed, 20 October 2010 17:12 UTC
Return-Path: <beaton@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6003A68B8 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.288
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.689, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HuJlNafKIufK for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA3D3A68A4 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kpbe15.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe15.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.79]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o9KHDaq1020174 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:13:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1287594817; bh=xlIk0sY6ro6VFNvywkDTyK1m+uI=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wnTlBjvXQBK7K3V5eQpzo9dyu/W+IhBvgcXQL+Y81kmrvL3VzXE+x59qEsvia2xuY dB1xopVyOW1UUKLGa/CxQ==
Received: from pwi2 (pwi2.prod.google.com [10.241.219.2]) by kpbe15.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o9KHDZgC010350 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:13:35 -0700
Received: by pwi2 with SMTP id 2so222101pwi.8 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wu4OmztEtAtN5VqH33jHqE9yA7BDitULVZCS6g42JWU=; b=Yqy/wg67QHDivrJ0kV0XYLyvSJ8aUn8SXXyLNJIY9fXC2NO0OmzClr19dmdtmJW4EM sxg4JX4jbq0GVAkKps9Q==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qDM3vHyPJirAHcGZz41+a9RVkY10N+/RLJjFvF1ovJbSSLBDLIDajS973RuRk8/hr4 MLTV0ftZ8t+RVdh8Ip4w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.166.4 with SMTP id o4mr1996525wfe.58.1287594815029; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.187.13 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739431D4FCC3E@TK5EX14MBXC203.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <AANLkTik30oVX+AevGCZDHajjyrDnEVB=fp6rAdihkPFz@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739431D4FCC3E@TK5EX14MBXC203.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:13:34 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=h71z6TzErSSwEn+nGi_maCNDQnrSOMS8_nmj9@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Eaton <beaton@google.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:12:08 -0000
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote: > I am willing to serve as editor for the bearer token specification and have my > management's approval to do so. Furthermore, I believe that I am qualified, > having successfully served as an editor for several standards specifications, > including the OASIS IMI specification and related SAML token profiles, the > OpenID PAPE specification, and (some time ago), the POSIX Threads standard. Thanks Mike! This sounds great.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Hannes Tschofenig
- [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split Blaine Cook
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Brian Eaton
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Blaine Cook
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Mike Jones
- [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Call fo… Freeman, Tim
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Cal… William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Cal… Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Cal… Skylar Woodward
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Cal… George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Cal… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Cal… Eve Maler
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Cal… Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Spl… Eran Hammer-Lahav