Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split

Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com> Wed, 20 October 2010 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mscurtescu@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BE73A681B for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.790, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C991YvcmZoP2 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284813A67D9 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hpaq13.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq13.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.13]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o9KItIZN008893 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:55:18 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1287600918; bh=WayEPV2bBj8iARtI5mRvRKzjwFE=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hVewtR51fGXp9mVR4ohUUBYtdb+/TEBCYnb2C0UB9AwIq+pJY1Z4rkAjgXncIi/Pu XyY046WpbK/n8oOBPizlQ==
Received: from gyg8 (gyg8.prod.google.com [10.243.50.136]) by hpaq13.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o9KIsGMl000817 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:55:17 -0700
Received: by gyg8 with SMTP id 8so2792042gyg.26 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nzwBK1AEdwsko4C1EcFAJTPNRZGdkyInsoTdA+0/sqQ=; b=RD88DhRJ+NCuG7EtfDVepwVF7mX9eqYRhAAp4M/f8CeTD03mmxaMIBbxZR83whqah6 s1f6qa82rAKPNsqTA5Tw==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=njkJ5H2/4k4+4Wv2IOri6HhTOkvUgGkKJLxv7rupdN6IjKSjByD7vO3vWS2GIkMj4y 8LaMTyJRyYApGfIEWq2A==
Received: by 10.101.82.10 with SMTP id j10mr5715274anl.245.1287600916658; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.136.3 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739431D4FCC3E@TK5EX14MBXC203.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <AANLkTik30oVX+AevGCZDHajjyrDnEVB=fp6rAdihkPFz@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739431D4FCC3E@TK5EX14MBXC203.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
From: Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:54:56 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikn2CQ7bBTMZf0YJ3WCcnWUjKMLYx=GNu9PaF86@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:53:46 -0000

+1


On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Mike Jones
<Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I am willing to serve as editor for the bearer token specification and have my management's approval to do so.  Furthermore, I believe that I am qualified, having successfully served as an editor for several standards specifications, including the OASIS IMI specification and related SAML token profiles, the OpenID PAPE specification, and (some time ago), the POSIX Threads standard.
>
>                                -- Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Blaine Cook
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 5:32 PM
> To: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split
>
> Over the past few weeks, the working group debated the issues around the introduction of signatures and the structure of the specification.
> The working group seems to endorse the proposal to split the current specification into two parts: one including section 5 (bearer token) and the other including the rest (how to obtain a token), with an additional specification covering signature use cases.
>
> This serves as a call for consensus on the proposed editorial work.
> Before we proceed with the changes, the chairs would like to ask if anyone has any concerns or objections against this proposal.
>
> In addition, the chairs are seeking a volunteer to take over the bearer token specification (section 5) as editor.
>
> Please submit your comments by Wednesday, October 20th.
>
> - The OAuth Working Group Chairs