Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Version Notification for draft-lodderstedt-oauth-par-00.txt

Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Mon, 30 September 2019 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1082120813 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VQds7tSnQ59w for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay07.ispgateway.de (smtprelay07.ispgateway.de [134.119.228.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28D4C12004F for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [73.202.53.104] (helo=[10.0.0.153]) by smtprelay07.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1iEy33-0008DI-1o; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:57:17 +0200
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
Message-Id: <AC387CB2-07ED-46F8-A40E-4766796B22E2@lodderstedt.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4B182FB4-30B6-4032-A2D4-E9CC1D13975B"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:57:12 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CA+k3eCQBhYJOw0yc_QpdCStnzA2zCzMO-UTCu=7CmgHwivRQFg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>, oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
To: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
References: <156906284888.22977.8893219801768603786.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1842D9CD-1B5B-420A-AA43-7B30F3CE13B8@lodderstedt.net> <CAGBSGjqdrCOZAu_2VvtjHVD+rBEK+0B86wNjoyXiQKAwS2Q4hA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+k3eCQBhYJOw0yc_QpdCStnzA2zCzMO-UTCu=7CmgHwivRQFg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Df-Sender: dG9yc3RlbkBsb2RkZXJzdGVkdC5uZXQ=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/kDqXcUtfonL1qw6EpWgV578SHws>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Version Notification for draft-lodderstedt-oauth-par-00.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:57:23 -0000

I wouldn't call it an API. What about just calling it an "HTTP endpoint"?

> On 30. Sep 2019, at 07:52, Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:30 AM Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> wrote:
> > The pushed authorization request endpoint shall be a RESTful API
> 
> I would drop the term RESTful and just say "HTTP API", as this
> description is arguably RESTful at best.
> 
> +1 
> 
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you.