Re: [ogpx] ogpx Digest, Vol 11, Issue 6

Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> Tue, 09 March 2010 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <josh@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A5C3A69C1 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:27:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.564
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.564 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.413, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eIz3xzDY-6Dc for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:27:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C233A67DD for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:27:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so2254058wwf.31 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:27:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.88.205 with SMTP id a55mr650755wef.122.1268094449047; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:27:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B902967.9000608@stpeter.im>
References: <mailman.155.1267732820.3585.ogpx@ietf.org> <adae2d8e1003041256i33081dbeiceb52b146f832af3@mail.gmail.com> <6c9fcc2a1003041340v2c50d6ap68e576c4b9e356ea@mail.gmail.com> <4B902967.9000608@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:27:29 -0800
Message-ID: <f72742de1003081627m604c59behff6a12bfb9cd1328@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [ogpx] ogpx Digest, Vol 11, Issue 6
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:27:37 -0000

Hey folks.

I have an Jabber<->SL text chat relay operational (modulo a bug here
or there). It uses the python pyogp library to talk to SL, and the
python xmpppy library to talk XMPP to a Jabber chat room. It ended up
being multiprocess so I can plug in additional relays and connections
- I'll have a go at getting IRC in as well. Any others we want
operational?

Sorry about the spam in IETF Island and ogpx@jabber.ietf.org for
anyone who wandered by. :)

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> On 3/4/10 2:40 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>>> If folks would be content with using IRC rather than Jabber I have an IRC
>>> <-> SL relay that works fairly well.
>>
>> Jabber is the official IETF IM mechanism.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3921 :)
>
>> It's certainly fine if we
>> can use IRC (or anything else), but we'll get the most connectivity
>> (and acceptance) if we can do our bridging with Jabber.
>
> There are IRC <=> XMPP bridges but SL <=> IRC <=> XMPP might be a bridge
> too far...
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list (VWRAP working group)
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>
>