Re: [ogpx] ogpx Digest, Vol 11, Issue 6

"Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com> Wed, 10 March 2010 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <john.hurliman@intel.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77D53A6AE7 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:44:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DcF1Y30NH648 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B0A3A6AE1 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2010 17:41:17 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,611,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="779437847"
Received: from rrsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.170]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2010 17:44:40 -0800
Received: from rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.39]) by rrsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.170]) with mapi; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:44:52 -0700
From: "Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com>
To: "ogpx@ietf.org" <ogpx@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:44:45 -0700
Thread-Topic: [ogpx] ogpx Digest, Vol 11, Issue 6
Thread-Index: Acq/4SCO/oIWAkThRtircGqIC1VehQAEgFpA
Message-ID: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DCB355593@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <mailman.155.1267732820.3585.ogpx@ietf.org> <adae2d8e1003041256i33081dbeiceb52b146f832af3@mail.gmail.com> <6c9fcc2a1003041340v2c50d6ap68e576c4b9e356ea@mail.gmail.com> <4B902967.9000608@stpeter.im> <f72742de1003081627m604c59behff6a12bfb9cd1328@mail.gmail.com> <b325928b1003081700u1f42fc80w1ccb0bb8d2aee5c0@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de1003091534o20ccce9en7c99fe4df8868a55@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f72742de1003091534o20ccce9en7c99fe4df8868a55@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [ogpx] ogpx Digest, Vol 11, Issue 6
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:44:51 -0000

We've been doing development in #vwrap on Freenode.
John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ogpx-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ogpx-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Joshua Bell
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 3:35 PM
> To: ogpx@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [ogpx] ogpx Digest, Vol 11, Issue 6
> 
> Update: using irclib.py I added an IRC module as well. If someone can
> suggest an IRC location for VWRAP discussions, I can give the
> three-way SL/XMPP/IRC bridging a public whirl. (We'll still have to
> sort out the "Note Well"/blue sheet issues.)
> 
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > <joke>maybe we should code a quick SL to SIMPLE gateway.</joke>
> >
> > --
> > meadhbh hamrick * it's pronounced "maeve"
> > @OhMeadhbh * http://meadhbh.org/ * OhMeadhbh@gmail.com
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hey folks.
> >>
> >> I have an Jabber<->SL text chat relay operational (modulo a bug here
> >> or there). It uses the python pyogp library to talk to SL, and the
> >> python xmpppy library to talk XMPP to a Jabber chat room. It ended
> up
> >> being multiprocess so I can plug in additional relays and
> connections
> >> - I'll have a go at getting IRC in as well. Any others we want
> >> operational?
> >>
> >> Sorry about the spam in IETF Island and ogpx@jabber.ietf.org for
> >> anyone who wandered by. :)
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre
> <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> >>> On 3/4/10 2:40 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> >>>>> If folks would be content with using IRC rather than Jabber I
> have an IRC
> >>>>> <-> SL relay that works fairly well.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jabber is the official IETF IM mechanism.
> >>>
> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3921 :)
> >>>
> >>>> It's certainly fine if we
> >>>> can use IRC (or anything else), but we'll get the most
> connectivity
> >>>> (and acceptance) if we can do our bridging with Jabber.
> >>>
> >>> There are IRC <=> XMPP bridges but SL <=> IRC <=> XMPP might be a
> bridge
> >>> too far...
> >>>
> >>> Peter
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Peter Saint-Andre
> >>> https://stpeter.im/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> ogpx mailing list (VWRAP working group)
> >>> ogpx@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ogpx mailing list (VWRAP working group)
> >> ogpx@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list (VWRAP working group)
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx