Re: [ogpx] ogpx Digest, Vol 11, Issue 6

Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com> Thu, 04 March 2010 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB803A8DE7 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:40:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZiiM4rBqteJW for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:40:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD613A8D70 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:40:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so3349866fxm.29 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:40:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wX7vm5L0Wnq2Z2o9ov2r4nKCHRN6VgBq4YVkELqzisQ=; b=w0+dJbtVg7p1/wY0W5c8wEoyZ7Hi1XjVFhb6Yv15L7+faxFUBXD8ynSH29cTiEcYoP D1x4HI6ReEIcKPXi7qgJzqDILGc8jAgNedgMOVNSquJ7c61MRx8+VogjLVD2UzYn3iqW qVLoI/pcnZejqVPmADbi5dHfPImnXKn/UscyU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=IrxWS0fP6NNSGKlF/N+6D6vhyuBCTUXISI5XDup1uCFLHFkU/Wmv/x5VIe3He/MUwq 51B3RvFft28qO331mI/rGpoHc045I7IjWDrABpgXaKFSEN1XLWcZz57LJRNZJbep93fW AkTNutgmHOHB8zq3FXCGB61N1Zt1D7XELG7LU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.5.81 with SMTP id 17mr19686fau.3.1267738808432; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:40:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <adae2d8e1003041256i33081dbeiceb52b146f832af3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.155.1267732820.3585.ogpx@ietf.org> <adae2d8e1003041256i33081dbeiceb52b146f832af3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:40:08 -0500
Message-ID: <6c9fcc2a1003041340v2c50d6ap68e576c4b9e356ea@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
To: kmancuso@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] ogpx Digest, Vol 11, Issue 6
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: barryleiba@computer.org
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:40:10 -0000

> If folks would be content with using IRC rather than Jabber I have an IRC
> <-> SL relay that works fairly well.

Jabber is the official IETF IM mechanism.  It's certainly fine if we
can use IRC (or anything else), but we'll get the most connectivity
(and acceptance) if we can do our bridging with Jabber.

Barry