Re: [ogpx] ogpx Digest, Vol 11, Issue 6

<joke>maybe we should code a quick SL to SIMPLE gateway.</joke>

--
meadhbh hamrick * it's pronounced "maeve"
@OhMeadhbh * http://meadhbh.org/ * OhMeadhbh@gmail.com


On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> wrote:
> Hey folks.
>
> I have an Jabber<->SL text chat relay operational (modulo a bug here
> or there). It uses the python pyogp library to talk to SL, and the
> python xmpppy library to talk XMPP to a Jabber chat room. It ended up
> being multiprocess so I can plug in additional relays and connections
> - I'll have a go at getting IRC in as well. Any others we want
> operational?
>
> Sorry about the spam in IETF Island and ogpx@jabber.ietf.org for
> anyone who wandered by. :)
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
>> On 3/4/10 2:40 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>>>> If folks would be content with using IRC rather than Jabber I have an IRC
>>>> <-> SL relay that works fairly well.
>>>
>>> Jabber is the official IETF IM mechanism.
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3921 :)
>>
>>> It's certainly fine if we
>>> can use IRC (or anything else), but we'll get the most connectivity
>>> (and acceptance) if we can do our bridging with Jabber.
>>
>> There are IRC <=> XMPP bridges but SL <=> IRC <=> XMPP might be a bridge
>> too far...
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> --
>> Peter Saint-Andre
>> https://stpeter.im/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ogpx mailing list (VWRAP working group)
>> ogpx@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list (VWRAP working group)
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>