Re: [ogpx] ogpx Digest, Vol 11, Issue 6

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 04 March 2010 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58643A8D70 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:43:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VSCoWX9UZl6e for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:43:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5B83A8710 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:43:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-201.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-201.cisco.com [64.101.72.201]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1183940D3A for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:43:04 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4B902967.9000608@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:43:03 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100216 Thunderbird/3.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ogpx@ietf.org
References: <mailman.155.1267732820.3585.ogpx@ietf.org> <adae2d8e1003041256i33081dbeiceb52b146f832af3@mail.gmail.com> <6c9fcc2a1003041340v2c50d6ap68e576c4b9e356ea@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6c9fcc2a1003041340v2c50d6ap68e576c4b9e356ea@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms020607010501010508060504"
Subject: Re: [ogpx] ogpx Digest, Vol 11, Issue 6
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:43:04 -0000

On 3/4/10 2:40 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> If folks would be content with using IRC rather than Jabber I have an IRC
>> <-> SL relay that works fairly well.
> 
> Jabber is the official IETF IM mechanism. 

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3921 :)

> It's certainly fine if we
> can use IRC (or anything else), but we'll get the most connectivity
> (and acceptance) if we can do our bridging with Jabber.

There are IRC <=> XMPP bridges but SL <=> IRC <=> XMPP might be a bridge
too far...

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/