IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] Draft work on Foundation and Type System

Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> Mon, 01 March 2010 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <josh@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E593A8BAE for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:47:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.522, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cHa50s62ThgV for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:47:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554293A8BA6 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:47:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wwb31 with SMTP id 31so1540579wwb.31 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:47:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.85.5 with SMTP id t5mr3281703wee.176.1267472834997; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:47:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <OF832CB1C8.9904045C-ON852576D9.0067880E-852576D9.0068D2D6@us.ibm.com>
References: <F5D86668-A4C7-4F2B-AA84-051879524D77@lindenlab.com> <OF832CB1C8.9904045C-ON852576D9.0067880E-852576D9.0068D2D6@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:47:14 -0800
Message-ID: <f72742de1003011147lddd1ac8qcf2a60a795f2a2ae@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e6d6486117aead0480c28403"
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Draft work on Foundation and Type System
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:47:19 -0000

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:04 AM, David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> wrote:

>
> There is the question of whether *some*
> of the current UDP traffic "Take two steps forward" "Rotate this prim 5
> degrees" again models exactly as posts on a REST resources or something
> different.
>

FYI, while it's not going to be fully baked, in prep for the "What's not in
VWRAP" discussion I want to have in Anaheim I'm going through the Linden
"legacy protocol" to populate categories of messages:

   - Messages with request/response semantics
   - Messages with lossy streaming semantics
   - Messages with notification semantics

... and the (independent?) axis of "does this need to be standardized at the
VWRAP level at all?"


> There is also a small set of operations which probably fall close to the
> "certified http" model Which Linden was working on a while back, where there
> is a very strong need to ensure close to ACID behavior.


Excellent point! I should add that to the list of categories.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email