Re: [ogpx] Draft work on Foundation and Type System

David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> Mon, 01 March 2010 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dwl@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A730B3A8AFB; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:56:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TQFvaoYuWwv0; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com (e8.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.138]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856613A797E; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (d01relay06.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.116]) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o21Jmn57022067; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:48:49 -0500
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o21JuWAs631026; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:56:32 -0500
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o21JuVaQ013556; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:56:31 -0500
Received: from d01ml605.pok.ibm.com (d01ml605.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.91]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o21JuVb0013553; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:56:31 -0500
In-Reply-To: <f72742de1003011147lddd1ac8qcf2a60a795f2a2ae@mail.gmail.com>
References: <F5D86668-A4C7-4F2B-AA84-051879524D77@lindenlab.com> <OF832CB1C8.9904045C-ON852576D9.0067880E-852576D9.0068D2D6@us.ibm.com> <f72742de1003011147lddd1ac8qcf2a60a795f2a2ae@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 2E505262:2D9EEA17-852576D9:006D1CD0; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.2 HF623 January 16, 2009
Message-ID: <OF2E505262.2D9EEA17-ON852576D9.006D1CD0-852576D9.006D8B55@us.ibm.com>
From: David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:56:31 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML605/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 03/01/2010 14:56:31, Serialize complete at 03/01/2010 14:56:31
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 006D8B55852576D9_="
Cc: ogpx-bounces@ietf.org, ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Draft work on Foundation and Type System
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:56:46 -0000

ogpx-bounces@ietf.org wrote on 03/01/2010 02:47:14 PM:

> [image removed] 
> 
> Re: [ogpx] Draft work on Foundation and Type System
> 
> Joshua Bell 
> 
> to:
> 
> ogpx
> 
> 03/01/2010 02:47 PM
> 
> Sent by:
> 
> ogpx-bounces@ietf.org
> 
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:04 AM, David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> There is the question of whether *some* 
> of the current UDP traffic "Take two steps forward" "Rotate this 
> prim 5 degrees" again models exactly as posts on a REST resources or
> something different.  
> 
> FYI, while it's not going to be fully baked, in prep for the "What's
> not in VWRAP" discussion I want to have in Anaheim I'm going through
> the Linden "legacy protocol" to populate categories of messages:
> Messages with request/response semantics
> Messages with lossy streaming semantics
> Messages with notification semantics
> ... and the (independent?) axis of "does this need to be 
> standardized at the VWRAP level at all?"
>  
The answer to the later, is yes if you ask me. If we can't describe
how the regions speak to the rest of the world, we're not actually 
going to have interop, we're either going to have insanely painful 
hand-off
between clients, or an informal, non specified set of rules everyone has 
to
follow. 


> There is also a small set of operations which probably fall close to
> the "certified http" model Which Linden was working on a while back,
> where there is a very strong need to ensure close to ACID behavior. 
> 
> Excellent point! I should add that to the list of categories.
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx