Re: [Ohttp] Discovery

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 25 June 2021 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76333A00D3 for <ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KA9mH_oJaHL9 for <ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB57F3A00C8 for <ohttp@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id b7so13585150ioq.12 for <ohttp@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RvapQ4Dvxr/Zp0PWigH6cd8rpvkc2Fi/2ZZD5cN1pJo=; b=m+6HpPo4HHkGR5DWeQHNMOy+KQIrXNY3Tr0+cWxSQm22xaT5EYIq6TnUvwIn8z2AkV ajEidJv6sUtOBCo5AubBSrJvFi2t7FaMXjdRYyT6BVMMetiAV6RaQGNypfqaCkWSh60t nmT+G+nQVW1XAUtp2vNiGJEuFfX2d/fUHzCgjHdzNS9BTci1SWk7cruCezxdjMxbYsln P6pmC2DsfEFHCessZGTftBBhj6zreW4PtlyING36xgol7Ugh/iewks1xRzOQVkivWT9p lbtrbT4UqVgg49jsEtK42VEmW7Z2RRT+Pqpxqe57ONoNH7hnpbRu/2DOQNyTgzJDdLqM 2J/w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RvapQ4Dvxr/Zp0PWigH6cd8rpvkc2Fi/2ZZD5cN1pJo=; b=R4VxRJlLp8gZXA6sC/9O/QMlFItyBiV4DQ7UTP/XWkTJC7ymLFvC78ZPAmIGeRghgl t5EtaFY1fxySsNcGMHHbZCT/8VeNXfAyFP9kp+NuM77Nz19RvvUE3JghhiIXvHZtmRM7 sx/P7hqKSen49gBhQgdpa1QEm/jfLVQtEx40+kJrwugEGFReQnnSVmfPr5duZrx4zxNx v2BTHd/gnjS1pvoNlRLw+5MFepdBvYCwPysi/JfoY+tnMkJB//Z/KzeqZsgX8EOtkZuJ OuO9ODcAlVMRotPDBhc2zDqzK3imvKwSy44VDh00ctC9sa2R/2yGp5TH+zGquLEGXBgI fZFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Eqqs43jFHZ4qOb+JYHNZg/QWEdbPm7YaQZpBg6xzXp9IM/U++ j5baG+zVlrOQdg6K6fIqdhFUEfnl7jeGxTyx7PRcaw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFZaBZoD+QifEGZwmY9IDWvTfBstr5CwO5vO4qR7hnezQtKIDB/1LecF+gCL50rtpnoWoXGdRccsotBVseiK8=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8b85:: with SMTP id p5mr9403062iol.43.1624645840372; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <D8268CF8-94DA-4E91-9286-4E45B8E26CB6@mnot.net> <c57ed5b0-c17a-0bca-f42a-dafaa1725792@lear.ch> <1F7246CE-589A-4B34-B514-AFA0F640A384@mnot.net> <238476f4-6bf9-4124-8146-e8c051b1b25f@www.fastmail.com> <f1308d19-085d-dadf-df69-da6f8b1b5171@lear.ch> <85F35B48-DAB9-4429-9538-625E03262CDE@mnot.net> <LO2P265MB0399E24FF16C8A459E70EC0BC2069@LO2P265MB0399.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <434C5683-4292-4354-B000-42C1EFFB026D@mnot.net> <LO2P265MB03993DA815DFE00C2A4DCC4AC2069@LO2P265MB0399.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CABcZeBOqas=GxSTWrMXWkrCroUp8dSUrnz0P4S3LFuBJ4BeHiw@mail.gmail.com> <3C3FE468-4447-47B0-8F07-0DE7602DE134@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C3FE468-4447-47B0-8F07-0DE7602DE134@cable.comcast.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:30:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOKvWxC=PrZ8CdChKXKHeZUJoU2=Gokqgp5g3a1m8PJ=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Andrew Campling <andrew.campling@419.consulting>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ohttp@ietf.org" <ohttp@ietf.org>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000033a43705c59b56c1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ohttp/LqeTTEYHad81RCrK6ZUeKDaKuNI>
Subject: Re: [Ohttp] Discovery
X-BeenThere: ohttp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Oblivious HTTP <ohttp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ohttp>, <mailto:ohttp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ohttp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ohttp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ohttp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ohttp>, <mailto:ohttp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 18:30:48 -0000

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:23 AM Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood=
40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> > The former is extremely difficult, for many of the same trust reasons
> that DoX discovery is difficult, but even moreso. The second is cleanly
> separable. Given that there is real value in the protocol with neither form
> of discovery, I don't think it's useful to charter them, especially in the
> absence of any real proposals. If someone comes up with such a proposal, we
> can consider a recharter then.
>
> Just throwing out ideas to see if there's common ground... Another way to
> approach it might be to say in the charter that discovery is not an initial
> priority but the WG may address it later on, or at a lower priority, or in
> parallel. That could enable those folks interested in that problem to feel
> like they have a productive outlet for doing so. Of course the challenge
> for the WG chairs would be to ensure that did not detract from dev of the
> core protocol.
>

This seems reasonable to me, as long as it's not a gating factor for
publishing the main document.

-Ekr


> JL
>
>
> --
> Ohttp mailing list
> Ohttp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ohttp
>