Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status

"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Fri, 11 August 2017 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F131324BF for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3p9_J4Y5vw0l for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from castro.crustytoothpaste.net (sandals-1-pt.tunnel.tserv8.dal1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f0e:3f1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C9A1324BC for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from genre.crustytoothpaste.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:b978:101:254c:7dd1:74c7:cde0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by castro.crustytoothpaste.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 203EE280AD; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 01:01:07 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=crustytoothpaste.net; s=default; t=1502413267; bh=K7uSyTz46b1lCU9irq52rVjUspZ9ai0iITtBd70h3V8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZCsqRsmk8qUr4B/j77a4hJbG+RpJI4N0lo1eZ3NIG2wnA24gBHXHbAUZCT97fz9UR HFfY0qY4i3/F4l3IbU5B9dAWUZMWlZ8hdN8GtQuvtgTmOSmmEMA3XGzWOIzjuDw5Eu qbshi+OWy+B4vk2Zk4c2IWSC6h6gWQBnzCuSAM6bN6rbt4uNXHAkqjT0k4Kf6N/gJH ce/momlTZjnYy/cpCOqKOip1BBfO1S0gOrA24zi/JACCkKOWfN9RpRkYhtHzduw/gS zuDdsfnyQVUgHx1RaRCo00g7YlGdB+Zi1CfgwVEA30LDrTgrgV5TN/S+unOR36dV1/ RD9jpHFJefQ15sPUlAYXebhTcrsbbxqiDws/6R+GppHFItQdd2AhhozOFaTzUhSVhz 2QRyUdIbgUXSsYw+cB0lfv3gLVq8gkGFXNQAfsm+RyHxGXVM1hFbnvFVtetiFRyrnV zNMVB4/j2yjHl5FZaXw2/OsiTJA1Xhhu8VbnYI1i5oJPUJJVJvt
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 01:01:01 +0000
From: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170811010100.d4juzbwmrmk7ndsm@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
References: <20170712223852.zmnvw4iwvziqsynq@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <20170810014751.erufvruh2lm5cdpe@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <904472b732df46958a9a0b27b4f9c008@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lqt5lq5de3dk3wir"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <904472b732df46958a9a0b27b4f9c008@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
X-Machine: Running on genre using GNU/Linux on x86_64 (Linux kernel 4.11.0-2-amd64)
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/RsOwmW3KjcJHE9ZAqqjkzAHygtU>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 01:01:11 -0000

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 02:27:08AM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > If we decide not to add it now, we could always do an
> > update in a future RFC if we change our minds later.
> 
> We can't even make progress on the current draft! The WG seems to be
> in the midst of being shut down; both one of the co-chairs and one of
> the Security AD's has spoken in favor of this.

Actually, we have an AEAD scheme and really just need a fingerprint
scheme to have a useful draft.  Until the working group closes, I'm
going to try to get us there.  Your input is of course welcome.
-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204