Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status

"brian m. carlson" <> Fri, 11 August 2017 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F131324BF for <>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (3072-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3p9_J4Y5vw0l for <>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:1f0e:3f1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C9A1324BC for <>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:b978:101:254c:7dd1:74c7:cde0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 203EE280AD; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 01:01:07 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=default; t=1502413267; bh=K7uSyTz46b1lCU9irq52rVjUspZ9ai0iITtBd70h3V8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZCsqRsmk8qUr4B/j77a4hJbG+RpJI4N0lo1eZ3NIG2wnA24gBHXHbAUZCT97fz9UR HFfY0qY4i3/F4l3IbU5B9dAWUZMWlZ8hdN8GtQuvtgTmOSmmEMA3XGzWOIzjuDw5Eu qbshi+OWy+B4vk2Zk4c2IWSC6h6gWQBnzCuSAM6bN6rbt4uNXHAkqjT0k4Kf6N/gJH ce/momlTZjnYy/cpCOqKOip1BBfO1S0gOrA24zi/JACCkKOWfN9RpRkYhtHzduw/gS zuDdsfnyQVUgHx1RaRCo00g7YlGdB+Zi1CfgwVEA30LDrTgrgV5TN/S+unOR36dV1/ RD9jpHFJefQ15sPUlAYXebhTcrsbbxqiDws/6R+GppHFItQdd2AhhozOFaTzUhSVhz 2QRyUdIbgUXSsYw+cB0lfv3gLVq8gkGFXNQAfsm+RyHxGXVM1hFbnvFVtetiFRyrnV zNMVB4/j2yjHl5FZaXw2/OsiTJA1Xhhu8VbnYI1i5oJPUJJVJvt
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 01:01:01 +0000
From: "brian m. carlson" <>
To: "Salz, Rich" <>
Cc: "" <>
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lqt5lq5de3dk3wir"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Machine: Running on genre using GNU/Linux on x86_64 (Linux kernel 4.11.0-2-amd64)
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 01:01:11 -0000

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 02:27:08AM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > If we decide not to add it now, we could always do an
> > update in a future RFC if we change our minds later.
> We can't even make progress on the current draft! The WG seems to be
> in the midst of being shut down; both one of the co-chairs and one of
> the Security AD's has spoken in favor of this.

Actually, we have an AEAD scheme and really just need a fingerprint
scheme to have a useful draft.  Until the working group closes, I'm
going to try to get us there.  Your input is of course welcome.
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US | My opinion only