Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 15 August 2017 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE5113226B for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z8zHD5vPh1fg for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 313B21243F6 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v7FIWn7X019471; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:35:09 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=9Bt9KUxDpAix62GOI/N5HS5DmJHTO/VM4KNrUocHRZI=; b=Ybhy8RV0+tQWGK5SaAost31Kfd45+y6nybyVdDRLQGOppEB+drUEHuhS5/HZ+wrb2wDe hNxq87p7kxPPLrhJRD594GsjZUAFJmoIfgwErwDhmnDSzJlj+hitI9F1mE4De55M/Nw7 CD25gBoXDWinKQ7b64Ai1VLHpPQ6nfIGP1HWKHLj9eHH2t/NYCnBekbUKXGDyxsE8oWl yEOiNAndfuxu6HpEfToSNt2wfwse4t7Lb47L6QKyIv8+mAlppoym+n15TfwzvML7a5Q8 Ynkp53RPbYv/8o42NT/14/aoIZFlxu1tuU9u2djV/bPQaPuEaRaeqCtWVwx9CWu+DroJ RA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2c9rxjwpbt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:35:09 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v7FIUrLV002174; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:35:08 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2c9w0uumxj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:35:08 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:35:07 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:35:07 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Robert J. Hansen" <rjh@sixdemonbag.org>, Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma@singpolyma.net>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [openpgp] Summary of WG status
Thread-Index: AQHTEXq6lkAlYxA1ZkyIkFTHuHwvsaJ9KmKAgAK2wQCAATdLAIAC68MFgABKjoCAAWHoAIAAOyWAgAAHGYD//9STAA==
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:35:06 +0000
Message-ID: <6F7900F8-5FA5-4A7D-9D55-BBD509113F66@akamai.com>
References: <20170712223852.zmnvw4iwvziqsynq@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <20170810014751.erufvruh2lm5cdpe@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <1b68dbbb-38ac-6370-fe20-76be795b2634@sixdemonbag.org> <20170811202924.yiwzjom3tag3ivkk@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <a2f2973f-2b34-5e07-2651-a1910d992c6a@sixdemonbag.org> <sjmefsef9b6.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <3bff215c-4de7-3994-8f78-5a06caa3fbfe@sixdemonbag.org> <20170815131326.wa5guttvgsp2la5g@calamity> <20170815164507.6111315.47595.68549@singpolyma.net> <8e062827-631e-24b0-3d19-40496c13f29c@sixdemonbag.org>
In-Reply-To: <8e062827-631e-24b0-3d19-40496c13f29c@sixdemonbag.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1b.0.161010
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.44.47]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <95284C187CC6914CA114AB466BDBF7D2@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-08-15_13:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1706020000 definitions=main-1708150309
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-08-15_13:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1706020000 definitions=main-1708150309
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/YjNOm23Du8wge4bVClJcHPXUkpg>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:35:13 -0000

    We have a proposal on the table.  Let's keep the WG discussion focused
    on yes or no to the proposal.  Let's not get sidetracked with other
    discussions.
    

The last we heard from the co-chairs and AD was that this group was going to be shut down.

Has anyone been in touch with them?

Has anyone volunteered to become a doc editor?