Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status

vedaal@nym.hush.com Thu, 10 August 2017 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <vedaal@nym.hush.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC8A132190 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hush.ai
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lHe5kdtQlTGo for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (smtp3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82E731320C9 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CFB5E0A09 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 15:41:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-hush-tls-connected: 1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=hush.ai; h=date:to:subject:from; s=hush; bh=uchjbqdKw0cXmjOKp1DZPWImia4hQcWw1Qh0w8lS4cw=; b=pIm7/CX34DPrZLZiU35KdmT0VKiEACK2augwFLP3E/AGHqgkEMyt8GwfNmtXGX8D5ai4Ea3LosiPfUNC/joXv7eebtndpcJvB4M0dxjrQOO4BKlWRglmpvaDD404Hh914zD1WLGxTSrkVd2/pv+OqzqeXLxx06U4xJs/Sr6DKYNpwHTXWvq+N6+l8jyqdAHBFpr87VXAJqz4ZhjS4jidhPpq6PuiQm0fodxa6ZWhPLa8e9V/jSPJSj1CGRlOF1iCqRTqv6pRM+P0ZkaOB0zHYg5BOfLaguCtYZScNjqul9YnVibiQGQCHMkHBz3IDYR3YpcV8pn5kRcpR1NZj/IJSA==
Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 15:41:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 2C335E03C6; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 15:41:53 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:41:52 -0400
To: "Robert J. Hansen" <rjh@sixdemonbag.org>, "openpgp" <openpgp@ietf.org>
From: vedaal@nym.hush.com
In-Reply-To: <1b68dbbb-38ac-6370-fe20-76be795b2634@sixdemonbag.org>
References: <20170712223852.zmnvw4iwvziqsynq@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <20170810014751.erufvruh2lm5cdpe@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <1b68dbbb-38ac-6370-fe20-76be795b2634@sixdemonbag.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_a31f5f1e61520086771ee867ed6e6ef5"
Message-Id: <20170810154153.2C335E03C6@smtp.hushmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/ofReuDiaZyr1YqS68xlgivLs4yk>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 15:41:57 -0000


On 8/9/2017 at 11:03 PM, "Robert J. Hansen"  wrote:I am completely
against even discussing this right now.  IMO, our #1
item right now is getting SHA-1 removed from the spec as thoroughly as
humanly possible.  The next is justifying the continued existence of
the WG.

Everything else -- *everything else* -- is an afterthought.

=====

In light  of your recent post, what about deprecating 3DES, or at
least adding a cautionary note and the NIST reference ?
vedaal