IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com Thu, 11 April 2024 06:31 UTC

Return-Path: <Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065D3C14F6BB for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=swisscom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1CO2g57v9vPA for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.swisscom.com (mailout110.swisscom.com [138.188.166.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58792C14F681 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.swisscom.com; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 08:31:36 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=swisscom.com; s=iscm; t=1712817097; bh=DL6vu3tD8fn0BXYKb/6pC0iolTkhD6psluDJNnvHIwk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To; b=qtBr5vkvvU+yqLOYFbCjoONURWBusFQWMVm6B8sJ+/EtC6UDbCDmjrJLU3harIYEi ASMmhI//K3xB/xpfkBLBygC/0rUlb1qHrwjVD8Pl35b/5XuQ//v2ur6GzGRJqY34RF w01xtC6U/ci1dkko6ifWNqXdYyvxs6XdL6PtGWhmbv1Edk9AqG8rTx759DOFsMagH6 Xsw76a91B21GFVFYL8GjlMLBiStG5n410hgHtfvFuN9R39Oh9b1QfGZoRJYyiMoycy U0OHaq3NOV3MIorAnXsauNmMCR6jBRiZsS0vPNLgQznoOsSXpyGVBY+WJyJY/6aVup KBgNqnjrGlRKw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="----=_Part_36637_765300690.1712817096626"
From: Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com
To: henk.birkholz@ietf.contact, opsawg@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03
Thread-Index: AQHaizcOpXPkJAQ+KE23VWo5rmtNELFinPkg
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 06:31:31 +0000
Message-ID: <a5202d645291417bb168a0e434be652a@swisscom.com>
References: <d75cddf8-8872-cb2e-fb13-82e2d978c9bb@ietf.contact>
In-Reply-To: <d75cddf8-8872-cb2e-fb13-82e2d978c9bb@ietf.contact>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-CH
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_ActionId=848fd78a-74f9-497e-b023-480e66e1851c; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_ContentBits=0; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_Name=C2 Internal; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_SetDate=2024-04-11T06:30:10Z; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_SiteId=364e5b87-c1c7-420d-9bee-c35d19b557a1;
x-originating-ip: [138.188.161.184]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mailer: Totemo_TrustMail_(Notification)
X-Trustmail: processed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/1WaUgZLvu62G8qwfErFcozi3vu0>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 06:31:47 -0000

Dear OPSAWG,

I have read the document and support the adoption in OPSAWG. A OAM terminology is much needed.

Best wishes
Thomas

-----Original Message-----
From: OPSAWG <opsawg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Henk Birkholz
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 1:06 PM
To: OPSAWG <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03


Be aware: This is an external email.



Dear OPSAWG members,

this email starts a call for Working Group Adoption of

> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-ques
> tion-mark-03.html

ending on Thursday, May 2nd.

As a reminder, this I-D summarizes how the term "Operations, Administration, and Maintenance" (OAM) is used currently & historically in the IETF and intends to consolidate unambiguous and protocol agnostic terminology for OAM. The summary includes descriptions of narrower semantics introduced by added qualifications the term OAM and a list of common capabilities that can be found in nodes processing OAM packets.

The chairs acknowledge a positive poll result at IETF119, but there has not been much discussion on the list yet. We would like to gather feedback from the WG if there is interest to further contribute and review. As a potential enabler for discussions, this call will last three weeks.

Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments you may have.


For the OPSAWG co-chairs,

Henk

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email