Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Hi Michael,
thank you for the update. I'm glad that you found the definition in RFC
9551 working for ANIMA's Autonomic Control Plane as well. I will read RFC
8994 to educate myself about it.

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:54 PM Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>
wrote:

>
> Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]> wrote:
>     > I have to repeat that the definitions of terms "in-band OAM",
> "out-of-band
>     > OAM", and "on-path telemetry"
>
>     > In-band OAM:  an active OAM method that is in band within the
>     > monitored DetNet OAM domain when it traverses the same set of
>     > links and interfaces receiving the same QoS and Packet
>     > Replication, Elimination, and Ordering Functions (PREOF) treatment
>     > as the monitored DetNet flow.
>
>     > Out-of-band OAM:  an active OAM method whose path through the DetNet
>     > domain may not be topologically identical to the path of the
>     > monitored DetNet flow, its test packets may receive different QoS
>     > and/or PREOF treatment, or both.
>
> On the topic of RFC8994's overlay management network, which we described as
> virtual out-of-band.  It would seem to fit into the above definition, since
> the overlay packets might go another route, and might get a different QoS
> treatment.
>
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>
>
>
>